The Map Matching plugin currently has issues with:
- high frequency traces and (performance)
- blobs, think noise at traffic signals (correctness)
This changeset implements trace-tidying transparently for the user.
We hopefully will see both performance gains as well as better matches!
- moves collapse into a dedicated set of functions / files
- make collapse scenarios distinct (slight performance cost)
- reduce verbosity for short name segments (now actually working, was supposed to do so before)
Lane Anticipation currently triggers on quick steps with lanes. This
changeset makes the "quick" part more dynamic by taking lanes left and
right of the turn into account. The reasoning for this is as follows.
The user can drive on the leftmost or rightmost lane and has to cross
all lanes left or right of the turn, respecitvely.
We scale our threshold appropriately, which now means the threshold
describes the duration the user needs for crossing _a single lane_.
Note: this is a heuristic and assumes the worst case. Which in my
opinion is fine to do since triggering Lane Anticipation in complex
scenarios is desirable.
adjust to generalFindMaximum function
moved parallel detection to ratio/absolute based regression testing
considerably improved detection quality using normalised regression lines
only follow initial direction/narrow turns for parallel detection
rename intersection (engine version) to IntermediateIntersection
follow coding convention for existing functions, move invalidate into routeStep
moved elongate into route step
move forward-step-signage into route step
replace post-processings `forwardInto` with `RouteStep` functionality. Don't change maneuver in step
separete declaration and implementation
Adds an `generate_hints=false` option which lets us skip generating and
emitting hints for Waypoints. This can be used to decrease the response
size when the user does not need hints anyway.
We should think about making `false` the default here in v6.
instead of artificially removing lanes from a roundabout, we don't assing them in the first place.
this also prevents a problem where we would end up collapsing turns with lanes in a roundabout
removes duplicated includes
removes unused includes
eliminates dedicated toolkits that resulted in circular dependencies
moves functionality close to data, where possible
Changes the processing order in the edge based graph factory.
Instead of iterating over all outgoing edges in order, we compute the edge
expanded graph in the order of intersections.
This allows to remember intersection shapes and re-use them for all possible ingoing edges.
Also: use low accuracry mode for intersections degree 2 intersections
We can use lower accuracy here, since the `bearing`
after the turn is not as relevant for off-route detection.
Getting lost is near impossible here.
This PR adds more advanced coordinate extraction, analysing the road
to detect offsets due to OSM way modelling.
In addition it improves the handling of bearings. Right now OSM reports
bearings simply based on the very first coordinate along a way.
With this PR, we store the bearings for a turn correctly, making the
bearings for turns correct.
This switchtes the data even if there are requests still running on the
old data. osrm-datastore then waits until all of these old requests have
finished before freeing the old regions.
This also means that osrm-datastore will return with an error if there
is a data update currenlty in progress.
Changes the internal representation of compressed geometries to be a
single array shared between forward and reverse geometries that can be
read in either direction. Includes a change on
extractor::OriginalEdgeData to store via_geometry ids that indicate
which direction to read the geometry for that edge based edge.
Closes#2592
Technically speaking we're changing the `libosrm` API.
But since we're only lifting restrictions by marking the API threadsafe,
we should be fine here.
With @karenzshea's name / ref split (ref. #2857) in master we want to
make use of it and reduce `NewName` instructions when ever possible.
This is a first step towards #2744 by using the already existing name
change heuristic from the extractor now in post-processing as well.
Limitations: at the moment we don't have the `SuffixTable` in
post-processing; this would require us serializing and subsequently
deserializing the table, passing it through from the profiles to the
API.
Before we only worked on subsequent quick turns, as in:
`right, right` keeps the user on the rightmost lanes.
This changeset modifies the logic to work on any subsequent steps
that are "quick" and have lane information we can constrain later.
Because we do not have a from-lane => to-lanes mapping we take the
lanes left and right of the turn lanes into account when heuristically
assigning the leftmost / rightmost lanes.
There are some edge cases where this still does not give us the optimal
solution but it gets close to what is actually possible at the moment
without having a lane mapping in post-processing.
References:
- https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2625
fix rebase
Staggered intersection are very short zig-zags of only a few meters.
They are common in rural and exurban areas, especially in the US.
(In addition, these cases could as well be tagging issues)
We do not want to announce these short left-rights or right-lefts:
* -> b a -> *
| or | becomes a -> b
a -> * * -> b
Here is one example:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/39.26017/-84.25182
And here are two edge-cases that we don't handle at the moment:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/38.87900/-76.98519
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/45.51056/-122.63462
and probably should not handle since the distance in between is
quite long (roughly 7-15 meters). For these we want to announce
two turns to not confuse the user.
Thanks to @1ec5 for raising this issue and @karenzshea for
providing additional US examples and cultural insights.
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/2685/files
fixes an issue where we did
elongate(fstStep, sndStep);
instead of
newStep = elongate(fstStep, sndStep);
we didn't get any warnings.
The only way to trigger a warning here is to use
```cpp
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
```
This changeset does exactly that: for the new guidance code prone to
these kind of issue we add such an attribute to the declaration.
After half a day of looking at the tagging and the data came to the
following conclusion:
We can't keep the user to the innermost / outermost lanes depending on
the exit the route takes: we found situations where both heuristics were
wrong.
Even on popular roundabouts the tagging is often wrong or in the best
case not present at all.
There are at least two different ways to interpret roundabout
indications: 1/ where e.g. a right arrow on the lane indicates turn
restrictions for the roundabout and the need to take this lane to exit
the roundabout to the right (possibly skipping multiple exits) and 2/
where a right arrow just means this is a lane in a immediate right turn.
Example: Australia marks lanes with arrows that seem to indicate
"angles you can exit the roundabout from", for example, these two ways:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320941710
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42918021
Whereas Germany marks lanes with "directions you can travel in these
lanes immediately after entering the roundabout":
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52578338
These two different interpretations of how to draw the arrows on the
roads mean we have conflicting solutions to "which lanes can you use to
take exit B from entry A" based on locality.
Continuing to tag ways based on lane markings is no problem, but
unfortunately, we can't reliably resolve good advice for navigation
system users (like "use the inside lane to take the second exit at the
roundabout"), there are too many situations that would generate bad
instructions (instructions that tell users to go into a lane they
shouldn't use).
This changeset implements Lane Anticipation on roundabouts, delimited
by enter / leave step pairs. It does not handle lane anticipation
within a roundabout.
Lane anticipation happens on the granularity of a valid roundbaout:
We discard partial roundabout (enter without exit or exit without
enter) or data issues (no roundabout, exit before enter).
Related:
- https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2626 for lanes
within a roundabout
- https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2625 for handling
going straight in lane anticipation
