Currently OSRM only supports turn restrictions with a single via-node or one
via-way. OSM allows for multiple via-ways to represent longer and more
complex restrictions.
This PR extends the use of duplicate nodes for representng via-way turn
restrictions to also support multi via-way restrictions. Effectively, this
increases the edge-based graph size by the number of edges in multi via-way
restrictions. However, given the low number of these restrictions it
has little effect on total graph size.
In addition, we add a new step in the extraction phase that constructs
a restriction graph to support more complex relationships between restrictions,
such as nested restrictions and overlapping restrictions.
Makes turn restrictions into dedicated structures and diferentiates between them via a variant.
Ensures that we do not accidentally mess up ID types within our application.
In addition this improves the restriction performance by only parsing all edges
once at the cost of (at the time of writing) 22MB in terms of main memory usage.
This adds the ability to mark ways with a user-defined
class in the profile. This class information will be included
in the response as property of the RouteStep object.
Phew, a lot of classes were affected by this. The rationale for the
changes are as follows:
- When a type X declares any constructor, the default constructor is
not declared, so there is no need for X() = delete there. In fact,
there is brutal difference between those two: deleted members
participate in overload resolution, but not-declared members do not!
- When a type X wants to be non-copyable (e.g. to be only movable, like
threads, unique_ptrs, and so on), you can either do it by inheriting
from boost::noncopyable (the old way), or better declare both (!) the
copy constructor _and_ the copy assignment operator as deleted:
X(X const&) = delete;
X& operator=(X const&) = delete;
We had tons of types with deleted copy constructors that were lacking
a corresponding deleted copy assignment operator, making them still
copyable and you wouldn't even notice (read: scary)!
References:
- http://accu.org/content/conf2014/Howard_Hinnant_Accu_2014.pdf
- http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/core/doc/html/core/noncopyable.html
Note: I know, I'm quoting Hinnant's extraordinary slides a lot, but
getting the sematic right here is so incredibly important.
