Phew, a lot of classes were affected by this. The rationale for the changes are as follows: - When a type X declares any constructor, the default constructor is not declared, so there is no need for X() = delete there. In fact, there is brutal difference between those two: deleted members participate in overload resolution, but not-declared members do not! - When a type X wants to be non-copyable (e.g. to be only movable, like threads, unique_ptrs, and so on), you can either do it by inheriting from boost::noncopyable (the old way), or better declare both (!) the copy constructor _and_ the copy assignment operator as deleted: X(X const&) = delete; X& operator=(X const&) = delete; We had tons of types with deleted copy constructors that were lacking a corresponding deleted copy assignment operator, making them still copyable and you wouldn't even notice (read: scary)! References: - http://accu.org/content/conf2014/Howard_Hinnant_Accu_2014.pdf - http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/core/doc/html/core/noncopyable.html Note: I know, I'm quoting Hinnant's extraordinary slides a lot, but getting the sematic right here is so incredibly important. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
http | ||
api_grammar.hpp | ||
connection.hpp | ||
request_handler.hpp | ||
request_parser.hpp | ||
server.hpp |