79 lines
2.6 KiB
Gherkin
79 lines
2.6 KiB
Gherkin
@routing @foot @way
|
|
Feature: Foot - Accessability of different way types
|
|
|
|
Background:
|
|
Given the profile "foot"
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Foot - Basic access
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | forw |
|
|
| motorway | |
|
|
| motorway_link | |
|
|
| trunk | |
|
|
| trunk_link | |
|
|
| primary | x |
|
|
| primary_link | x |
|
|
| secondary | x |
|
|
| secondary_link | x |
|
|
| tertiary | x |
|
|
| tertiary_link | x |
|
|
| residential | x |
|
|
| service | x |
|
|
| unclassified | x |
|
|
| living_street | x |
|
|
| road | x |
|
|
| track | x |
|
|
| path | x |
|
|
| footway | x |
|
|
| pedestrian | x |
|
|
| steps | x |
|
|
| pier | x |
|
|
| cycleway | |
|
|
| bridleway | |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Foot - Basic access
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | leisure | forw |
|
|
| (nil) | track | x |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Foot - Proposed ways
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | foot | proposed | forw |
|
|
| footway | | | x |
|
|
| proposed | | | |
|
|
| proposed | yes | yes | |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Foot - Basic access with profile.uselocationtags.trunk = true
|
|
|
|
Given the profile file "foot" initialized with
|
|
"""
|
|
profile.uselocationtags.trunk = true
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | forw |
|
|
| motorway | |
|
|
| motorway_link | |
|
|
| trunk | x |
|
|
| trunk_link | x |
|
|
| primary | x |
|
|
| primary_link | x |
|
|
| secondary | x |
|
|
| secondary_link | x |
|
|
| tertiary | x |
|
|
| tertiary_link | x |
|
|
| residential | x |
|
|
| service | x |
|
|
| unclassified | x |
|
|
| living_street | x |
|
|
| road | x |
|
|
| track | x |
|
|
| path | x |
|
|
| footway | x |
|
|
| pedestrian | x |
|
|
| steps | x |
|
|
| pier | x |
|
|
| cycleway | |
|
|
| bridleway | |
|
|
|