Open-Harbor/osrm-backend
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity
24fe881d03
osrm-backend/features/car/access.feature
Daniel J. Hofmann 919386bdaf Adds access=permissive routability scenarios, see #3435.
2017-02-08 14:27:55 +00:00

273 lines
18 KiB
Gherkin
Raw Blame History

@routing @car @access
Feature: Car - Restricted access
# Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Background:
Given the profile "car"
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| yes | | | | x |
| no | | | | |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| no | yes | | | x |
| yes | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| no | | yes | | x |
| yes | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| no | | | yes | x |
| yes | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy and forward/backward
Then routability should be
| access | access:forward | access:backward | motorcar | motorcar:forward | motorcar:backward | forw | backw |
| | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | no | | | | | | x |
| yes | yes | | no | | | | |
| yes | yes | | yes | no | | | x |
| yes | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | | no | | | | x | |
| yes | | yes | no | | | | |
| yes | | yes | yes | | no | x | |
| no | | | | | | | |
| no | yes | | | | | x | |
| no | no | | yes | | | x | x |
| no | no | | no | yes | | x | |
| no | | | | | | | |
| no | | yes | | | | | x |
| no | | no | yes | | | x | x |
| no | | no | no | | yes | | x |
| | no | | | no | | | x |
| | | no | | | no | x | |
| | no | | | | no | | |
| | | no | no | | | | |
| | no | | | yes | | x | x |
| | | no | | | yes | x | x |
| | yes | | | no | | | x |
| | | yes | | | no | x | |
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| yes | | | | x |
| no | | | | |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| no | yes | | | x |
| yes | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| no | | yes | | x |
| yes | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| no | | | yes | x |
| yes | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Car - Overwriting implied acccess on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| primary | | | | | x |
| runway | | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | |
| primary | | no | | | |
| primary | | | no | | |
| primary | | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Car - Overwriting implied acccess on nodes
Then routability should be
| highway | node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
| primary | | | | | x |
| runway | | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | |
| primary | | no | | | |
| primary | | | no | | |
| primary | | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | | |
| runway | | | yes | | |
| runway | | | | yes | |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be
| access | bothw |
| yes | x |
| permissive | x |
| designated | x |
| no | |
| private | |
| agricultural | |
| forestry | |
| psv | |
| delivery | |
| some_tag | x |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | bothw |
| yes | x |
| permissive | x |
| designated | x |
| no | |
| private | |
| agricultural | |
| forestry | |
| psv | |
| delivery | |
| some_tag | x |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on both node and way
Then routability should be
| access | node/access | bothw |
| yes | yes | x |
| yes | no | |
| yes | some_tag | x |
| no | yes | |
| no | no | |
| no | some_tag | |
| some_tag | yes | x |
| some_tag | no | |
| some_tag | some_tag | x |
Scenario: Car - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | accesss | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| runway | private | | | permissive | x |
| primary | forestry | | yes | | x |
| cycleway | | | designated | | x |
| residential | | yes | no | | |
| motorway | yes | permissive | | private | |
| trunk | agricultural | designated | permissive | no | |
| pedestrian | | | | | |
| pedestrian | | | | destination | x |
Scenario: Car - Ignore access tags for other modes
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | psv | motorhome | bothw |
| runway | yes | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | | |
| primary | | no | | | x |
| runway | | | yes | | |
| primary | | | no | | x |
| runway | | | | yes | |
| primary | | | | no | x |
@hov
Scenario: Car - only designated HOV ways are ignored by default
Then routability should be
| highway | hov | bothw |
| primary | designated | |
| primary | yes | x |
| primary | no | x |
@hov
Scenario: Car - a way with all lanes HOV-designated is inaccessible by default (similar to hov=designated)
Then routability should be
| highway | hov:lanes:forward | hov:lanes:backward | hov:lanes | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | designated | designated | | | | |
| primary | | designated | | | x | |
| primary | designated | | | | | x |
| primary | designated\|designated | designated\|designated | | | | |
| primary | designated\|no | designated\|no | | | x | x |
| primary | yes\|no | yes\|no | | | x | x |
| primary | | | | | x | x |
| primary | designated | | | -1 | | x |
| primary | | designated | | -1 | | |
| primary | | | designated | yes | | |
| primary | | | designated | -1 | | |
| primary | | | designated\| | yes | x | |
| primary | | | designated\| | -1 | | x |
| primary | | | designated\|designated | yes | | |
| primary | | | designated\|designated | -1 | | |
| primary | | | designated\|yes | yes | x | |
| primary | | | designated\|no | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Car - these toll roads always work
Then routability should be
| highway | toll | bothw |
| primary | no | x |
| primary | snowmobile | x |
# To test this we need issue #2781
@todo
Scenario: Car - only toll=yes ways are ignored by default
Then routability should be
| highway | toll | bothw |
| primary | yes | |
Scenario: Car - directional access tags
Then routability should be
| highway | access | access:forward | access:backward | forw | backw |
| primary | yes | yes | yes | x | x |
| primary | yes | | no | x | |
| primary | yes | no | | | x |
| primary | yes | no | no | | |
| primary | no | no | no | | |
| primary | no | | yes | | x |
| primary | no | yes | | x | |
| primary | no | yes | yes | x | x |
Scenario: Car - barrier=gate should be routed over unless explicitely forbidden
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | access | bothw |
| gate | | x |
| gate | no | |
| gate | yes | x |
| gate | permissive | x |
| gate | designated | x |
| gate | private | |
| gate | garbagetag | x |
Scenario: Car - a way with conditional access
Then routability should be
| highway | vehicle:forward | vehicle:backward:conditional | forw | backw |
| pedestrian | yes | delivery @ (20:00-11:00) | x | |
Scenario: Car - a way with a list of tags
Then routability should be
| highway | motor_vehicle | motor_vehicle:forward | motor_vehicle:backward | forw | backw |
| footway | | | destination | | x |
| track | destination;agricultural | destination | | x | x |
Scenario: Car - Don't route over steps even if marked as accessible
Then routability should be
| highway | access | forw | backw |
| steps | yes | | |
| steps | no | | |
| primary | | x | x |
Scenario: Car - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | access | bothw |
| primary | permissive | x |
| steps | permissive | |
| footway | permissive | x |
| garbagetag | permissive | x |
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink