osrm-backend/features/car/access.feature
Siarhei Fedartsou aadc088084
Fix distance calculation consistency. (#6315)
Consolidate great circle distance calculations to use cheap ruler library.
2022-08-19 22:31:40 +01:00

308 lines
20 KiB
Gherkin

@routing @car @access
Feature: Car - Restricted access
# Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Background:
Given the profile "car"
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| yes | | | | x |
| no | | | | |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| no | yes | | | x |
| yes | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| no | | yes | | x |
| yes | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| no | | | yes | x |
| yes | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy and forward/backward
Then routability should be
| access | access:forward | access:backward | motorcar | motorcar:forward | motorcar:backward | forw | backw |
| | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | no | | | | | | x |
| yes | yes | | no | | | | |
| yes | yes | | yes | no | | | x |
| yes | | | | | | x | x |
| yes | | no | | | | x | |
| yes | | yes | no | | | | |
| yes | | yes | yes | | no | x | |
| no | | | | | | | |
| no | yes | | | | | x | |
| no | no | | yes | | | x | x |
| no | no | | no | yes | | x | |
| no | | | | | | | |
| no | | yes | | | | | x |
| no | | no | yes | | | x | x |
| no | | no | no | | yes | | x |
| | no | | | no | | | x |
| | | no | | | no | x | |
| | no | | | | no | | |
| | | no | no | | | | |
| | no | | | yes | | x | x |
| | | no | | | yes | x | x |
| | yes | | | no | | | x |
| | | yes | | | no | x | |
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| yes | | | | x |
| no | | | | |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| no | yes | | | x |
| yes | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| no | | yes | | x |
| yes | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| no | | | yes | x |
| yes | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Car - Overwriting implied acccess on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| primary | | | | | x |
| runway | | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | |
| primary | | no | | | |
| primary | | | no | | |
| primary | | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Car - Overwriting implied acccess on nodes
Then routability should be
| highway | node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
| primary | | | | | x |
| runway | | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | |
| primary | | no | | | |
| primary | | | no | | |
| primary | | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | | |
| runway | | | yes | | |
| runway | | | | yes | |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be
| access | bothw |
| yes | x |
| permissive | x |
| designated | x |
| no | |
| private | x |
| agricultural | |
| forestry | |
| psv | |
| delivery | x |
| some_tag | x |
| destination | x |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | bothw |
| yes | x |
| permissive | x |
| designated | x |
| no | |
| private | x |
| agricultural | |
| forestry | |
| psv | |
| delivery | x |
| some_tag | x |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on both node and way
Then routability should be
| access | node/access | bothw |
| yes | yes | x |
| yes | no | |
| yes | some_tag | x |
| no | yes | |
| no | no | |
| no | some_tag | |
| some_tag | yes | x |
| some_tag | no | |
| some_tag | some_tag | x |
Scenario: Car - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | forw | backw | # |
| runway | private | | | permissive | x | x | |
| primary | forestry | | yes | | x | x | |
| cycleway | | | designated | | x | x | |
| unclassified | | | destination | destination | x | x | |
| residential | | yes | no | | | | |
| motorway | yes | permissive | | private | x | | implied oneway |
| trunk | agricultural | designated | permissive | no | | | |
| pedestrian | | | | | | | |
| pedestrian | | | | destination | | | temporary disabled #3773 |
Scenario: Car - Ignore access tags for other modes
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | psv | motorhome | bothw |
| runway | yes | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | | |
| primary | | no | | | x |
| runway | | | yes | | |
| primary | | | no | | x |
| runway | | | | yes | |
| primary | | | | no | x |
@hov
Scenario: Car - designated HOV ways are rated low
Then routability should be
| highway | hov | bothw | forw_rate | backw_rate |
| primary | designated | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| primary | yes | x | 18.3 | 18.3 |
| primary | no | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
# Models:
# https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124891268
# https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237173472
@hov
Scenario: Car - I-66 use HOV-only roads with heavy penalty
Then routability should be
| highway | hov | hov:lanes | lanes | access | oneway | forw | backw | forw_rate |
| motorway | designated | designated\|designated\|designated | 3 | hov | yes | x | | 25 |
| motorway | lane | | 3 | designated | yes | x | | 25.3 |
@hov
Scenario: Car - a way with all lanes HOV-designated is highly penalized by default (similar to hov=designated)
Then routability should be
| highway | hov:lanes:forward | hov:lanes:backward | hov:lanes | oneway | forw | backw | forw_rate | backw_rate |
| primary | designated | designated | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
# This test is flaky because non-deterministic turn generation sometimes emits a NoTurn here that is marked as restricted. #3769
#| primary | | designated | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
#| primary | designated | | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| primary | designated\|designated | designated\|designated | | | x | x | 18.3 | 18.3 |
| primary | designated\|no | designated\|no | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| primary | yes\|no | yes\|no | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| primary | | | | | x | x | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| primary | designated | | | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
| primary | | designated | | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
| primary | | | designated | yes | x | | 18.2 | |
| primary | | | designated | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
| primary | | | designated\| | yes | x | | 18.2 | |
| primary | | | designated\| | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
| primary | | | designated\|designated | yes | x | | 18.2 | |
| primary | | | designated\|designated | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
| primary | | | designated\|yes | yes | x | | 18.2 | |
| primary | | | designated\|no | -1 | | x | | 18.2 |
Scenario: Car - these toll roads always work
Then routability should be
| highway | toll | bothw |
| primary | no | x |
| primary | snowmobile | x |
Scenario: Car - toll=yes ways are enabled by default
Then routability should be
| highway | toll | bothw |
| primary | yes | x |
Scenario: Car - directional access tags
Then routability should be
| highway | access | access:forward | access:backward | forw | backw |
| primary | yes | yes | yes | x | x |
| primary | yes | | no | x | |
| primary | yes | no | | | x |
| primary | yes | no | no | | |
| primary | no | no | no | | |
| primary | no | | yes | | x |
| primary | no | yes | | x | |
| primary | no | yes | yes | x | x |
Scenario: Car - barrier=gate should be routed over unless explicitely forbidden
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | access | bothw |
| gate | | x |
| gate | no | |
| gate | yes | x |
| gate | permissive | x |
| gate | designated | x |
| gate | private | x |
| gate | garbagetag | x |
Scenario: Car - a way with conditional access
Then routability should be
| highway | vehicle:forward | vehicle:backward:conditional | forw | backw |
| pedestrian | yes | delivery @ (20:00-11:00) | x | |
Scenario: Car - a way with a list of tags
Then routability should be
| highway | motor_vehicle | motor_vehicle:forward | motor_vehicle:backward | forw | backw | # |
| primary | | no | destination | | x | |
| primary | destination;agricultural | destination | | x | x | |
| footway | | | destination | | | temporary #3373 |
| track | destination;agricultural | destination | | | x | temporary #3373 |
Scenario: Car - Don't route over steps even if marked as accessible
Then routability should be
| highway | access | forw | backw |
| steps | yes | | |
| steps | no | | |
| primary | | x | x |
Scenario: Car - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | access | bothw |
| primary | permissive | x |
| steps | permissive | |
| footway | permissive | x |
| garbagetag | permissive | x |
Scenario: Car - Access private blacklist
Then routability should be
| highway | access | bothw |
| footway | yes | x |
| pedestrian | private | |
| footway | private | |
| service | private | |
| cycleway | private | |
| track | private | |
| footway | customers | |
Scenario: Car - Access blacklist
Then routability should be
| highway | access | bothw |
| primary | | x |
| primary | emergency | |
| primary | forestry | |
| primary | agricultural | |
| primary | psv | |
| primary | no | |
| primary | customers | x |