bdb116afe5
* upgrade to api version 4 * set bike pushing speed to 4km/h and add mode change penalty * set cycleways for two-way and one-way roads according correctly * add changelog * adjust tests according to change of the walking speed * adjust tests according to new behaviour of opposite, track and lane in one-ways * refactor the cycleway identification * comment to understand weird counterintuitive testcase * adjust sliproad test because walking speed is now slower
152 lines
7.8 KiB
Gherkin
152 lines
7.8 KiB
Gherkin
@routing @bicycle @oneway
|
|
Feature: Bike - Oneway streets
|
|
# Handle oneways streets, as defined at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
|
|
# Usually we can push bikes against oneways, but we use foot=no to prevent this in these tests
|
|
|
|
Background:
|
|
Given the profile "bicycle"
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Simple oneway
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
|
|
| primary | no | yes | cycling | |
|
|
| primary | | yes | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Simple reverse oneway
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
|
|
| primary | no | -1 | | cycling |
|
|
| primary | | -1 | pushing bike | cycling |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Around the Block
|
|
Given the node map
|
|
"""
|
|
a b
|
|
f d c e
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
And the ways
|
|
| nodes | oneway | foot |
|
|
| ab | yes | no |
|
|
| bc | | no |
|
|
| cd | | no |
|
|
| da | | no |
|
|
| df | | no |
|
|
| ce | | no |
|
|
|
|
When I route I should get
|
|
| from | to | route |
|
|
| a | b | ab,ab |
|
|
| b | a | bc,cd,da,da |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Handle various oneway tag values
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| foot | oneway | forw | backw |
|
|
| no | | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | nonsense | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | false | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | 0 | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | yes | cycling | |
|
|
| no | true | cycling | |
|
|
| no | 1 | cycling | |
|
|
| no | -1 | | cycling |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Implied oneways
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | foot | bicycle | junction | forw | backw | # |
|
|
| | no | | | cycling | cycling | |
|
|
| | no | | roundabout | cycling | | |
|
|
| motorway | no | yes | | cycling | | |
|
|
| motorway_link | no | yes | | cycling | cycling | does not imply oneway |
|
|
| motorway | no | yes | roundabout | cycling | | |
|
|
| motorway_link | no | yes | roundabout | cycling | | |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Overriding implied oneways
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | foot | junction | oneway | forw | backw |
|
|
| primary | no | roundabout | no | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| primary | no | roundabout | yes | cycling | |
|
|
| motorway_link | no | | -1 | | |
|
|
| trunk_link | no | | -1 | | |
|
|
| primary | no | roundabout | -1 | | cycling |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Oneway:bicycle should override normal oneways tags
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| foot | oneway:bicycle | oneway | junction | forw | backw |
|
|
| no | yes | | | cycling | |
|
|
| no | yes | yes | | cycling | |
|
|
| no | yes | no | | cycling | |
|
|
| no | yes | -1 | | cycling | |
|
|
| no | yes | | roundabout | cycling | |
|
|
| no | no | | | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | yes | | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | no | | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | -1 | | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | | roundabout | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | | | | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | yes | | | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | no | | | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | -1 | | | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | | roundabout | | cycling |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Contra flow
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| foot | oneway | cycleway | forw | backw |
|
|
| no | yes | opposite | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | yes | opposite_track | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | yes | opposite_lane | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | opposite | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | opposite_track | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | -1 | opposite_lane | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | opposite | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | opposite_track | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | no | opposite_lane | cycling | cycling |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Should not be affected by car tags
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| foot | junction | oneway | oneway:car | forw | backw |
|
|
| no | | yes | yes | cycling | |
|
|
| no | | yes | no | cycling | |
|
|
| no | | yes | -1 | cycling | |
|
|
| no | | no | yes | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | | no | no | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | | no | -1 | cycling | cycling |
|
|
| no | | -1 | yes | | cycling |
|
|
| no | | -1 | no | | cycling |
|
|
| no | | -1 | -1 | | cycling |
|
|
| no | roundabout | | yes | cycling | |
|
|
| no | roundabout | | no | cycling | |
|
|
| no | roundabout | | -1 | cycling | |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Two consecutive oneways
|
|
Given the node map
|
|
"""
|
|
a b c
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
And the ways
|
|
| nodes | oneway |
|
|
| ab | yes |
|
|
| bc | yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I route I should get
|
|
| from | to | route |
|
|
| a | c | ab,bc,bc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Left/right cycleways on oneways
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| highway | oneway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
|
|
| primary | yes | | | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
| primary | yes | | track | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
| primary | yes | track | | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
| primary | yes | track | track | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bike - Left/right cycleways on any oneways
|
|
Then routability should be
|
|
| foot | oneway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
|
|
| no | yes | track | | cycling | |
|
|
| yes | yes | track | | cycling | pushing bike |
|
|
| yes | -1 | track | | pushing bike | cycling | |