Open-Harbor/osrm-backend
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #457 from ibikecph/cuke_penalty_pass

Browse Source 
fix penalty test, now passing
This commit is contained in:
Project OSRM 2012-09-28 08:37:34 -07:00
commit f14c76dbca
1 changed files with 48 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
features/penalty.feature
View File

@ -45,11 +45,56 @@ Testbot uses a signal penalty of 7s
When I route I should get When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time | | from | to | route | time |
| a | b | abc | 10s +-1 | | a | b | abc | 10s +-1 |
| a | c | abc | 17s +-1 | | a | c | abc | 27s +-1 |
| d | e | def | 20s +-1 | | d | e | def | 20s +-1 |
| d | f | def | 27s +-1 | | d | f | def | 47s +-1 |
| g | h | ghi | 30s +-1 | | g | h | ghi | 30s +-1 |
| g | i | ghi | 37s +-1 | | g | i | ghi | 67s +-1 |
Scenario: Passing multiple traffic signals should incur a accumulated delay
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d | e |
And the nodes
| node | highway |
| b | traffic_signals |
| c | traffic_signals |
| d | traffic_signals |
And the ways
| nodes |
| abcde |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | e | abcde | 61s +-1 |
Scenario: Signal penalty should not depend on way type
Given the node map
| a | b | c |
| d | e | f |
| g | h | i |
And the nodes
| node | highway |
| b | traffic_signals |
| e | traffic_signals |
| h | traffic_signals |
And the ways
| nodes | highway |
| abc | primary |
| def | secondary |
| ghi | tertiary |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | b | abc | 10s +-1 |
| a | c | abc | 27s +-1 |
| d | e | def | 20s +-1 |
| d | f | def | 47s +-1 |
| g | h | ghi | 30s +-1 |
| g | i | ghi | 67s +-1 |
Scenario: Passing multiple traffic signals should incur a accumulated delay Scenario: Passing multiple traffic signals should incur a accumulated delay
Given the node map Given the node map