Fix tag misspellings in profiles + tests: forestry, pebblestone
This commit is contained in:
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
|
||||
| no | | | |
|
||||
| private | | | |
|
||||
| agricultural | | | |
|
||||
| forestery | | | |
|
||||
| forestry | | | |
|
||||
| | yes | | x |
|
||||
| | permissive | | x |
|
||||
| | designated | | x |
|
||||
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
|
||||
| | no | | |
|
||||
| | private | | |
|
||||
| | agricultural | | |
|
||||
| | forestery | | |
|
||||
| | forestry | | |
|
||||
| | | yes | x |
|
||||
| | | permissive | x |
|
||||
| | | designated | x |
|
||||
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
|
||||
| | | no | |
|
||||
| | | private | |
|
||||
| | | agricultural | |
|
||||
| | | forestery | |
|
||||
| | | forestry | |
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on both node and way
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
| no | | | |
|
||||
| private | | | |
|
||||
| agricultural | | | |
|
||||
| forestery | | | |
|
||||
| forestry | | | |
|
||||
| | yes | | x |
|
||||
| | permissive | | x |
|
||||
| | designated | | x |
|
||||
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
| | no | | |
|
||||
| | private | | |
|
||||
| | agricultural | | |
|
||||
| | forestery | | |
|
||||
| | forestry | | |
|
||||
| | | yes | x |
|
||||
| | | permissive | x |
|
||||
| | | designated | x |
|
||||
@@ -62,4 +62,4 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
| | | no | |
|
||||
| | | private | |
|
||||
| | | agricultural | |
|
||||
| | | forestery | |
|
||||
| | | forestry | |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Surfaces
|
||||
| cycleway | unpaved | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | fine_gravel | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | gravel | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | pebbelstone | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | pebblestone | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | dirt | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | earth | 120s |
|
||||
| cycleway | grass | 120s |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on ways
|
||||
| no | | |
|
||||
| private | | |
|
||||
| agricultural | | |
|
||||
| forestery | | |
|
||||
| forestry | | |
|
||||
| | yes | x |
|
||||
| | permissive | x |
|
||||
| | designated | x |
|
||||
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on ways
|
||||
| | no | |
|
||||
| | private | |
|
||||
| | agricultural | |
|
||||
| | forestery | |
|
||||
| | forestry | |
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Foot - Access tags on both node and way
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
| no | | |
|
||||
| private | | |
|
||||
| agricultural | | |
|
||||
| forestery | | |
|
||||
| forestry | | |
|
||||
| no | yes | x |
|
||||
| no | permissive | x |
|
||||
| no | designated | x |
|
||||
@@ -47,4 +47,4 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
| yes | no | |
|
||||
| yes | private | |
|
||||
| yes | agricultural | |
|
||||
| yes | forestery | |
|
||||
| yes | forestry | |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ Feature: Foot - Surfaces
|
||||
| footway | | 145s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | fine_gravel | 193s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | gravel | 193s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | pebbelstone | 193s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | pebblestone | 193s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | mud | 289s ~10% |
|
||||
| footway | sand | 289s ~10% |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user