Open-Harbor/osrm-backend
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity

update profile and tests for pushing of bikes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Emil Tin
2013-02-03 13:08:11 +01:00
parent b3d517943a
commit dd5d520b53
9 changed files with 494 additions and 304 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
features/bicycle/access.feature
+92 -75
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
@routing @bicycle @access
Feature: Bike - Restricted access
Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Background:
@@ -7,37 +7,95 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| no | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | no | | |
| no | yes | | x |
| yes | no | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | no | |
| no | | yes | x |
| yes | | no | |
| | no | yes | x |
| | yes | no | |
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
| runway | | | | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | no | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | no | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | yes | x |
| runway | | | no | |
| runway | no | | yes | x |
| runway | yes | | no | |
| runway | | no | yes | x |
| runway | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| no | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | no | | |
| no | yes | | x |
| yes | no | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | no | |
| no | | yes | x |
| yes | | no | |
| | no | yes | x |
| | yes | no | |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in forward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | x | |
| | yes | | | x | |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | x | |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | x | |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | x | |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | x | |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | x | |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | x | |
| runway | yes | | | x | |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x | |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x | |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | x | |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | x | |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | x | |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in backward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | | x |
| | yes | | | | x |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | | x |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | | x |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | | x |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | | x |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | | x |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | | x |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | | x |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on ways
Then routability should be
@@ -51,18 +109,6 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on nodes
Then routability should be
| highway | node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | |
| runway | | yes | | |
| runway | | | yes | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
@@ -92,35 +138,6 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| permissive | | | x |
| designated | | | x |
| some_tag | | | x |
| no | | | |
| private | | | |
| agricultural | | | |
| forestery | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | permissive | | x |
| | designated | | x |
| | some_tag | | x |
| | no | | |
| | private | | |
| | agricultural | | |
| | forestery | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | permissive | x |
| | | designated | x |
| | | some_tag | x |
| | | no | |
| | | private | |
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on both node and way
Then routability should be
| access | node/access | bothw |
@@ -147,10 +164,10 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Scenario: Bike - Ignore access tags for other modes
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | motor_vehicle | moped | bothw |
| runway | yes | | | |
| highway | boat | motor_vehicle | moped | bothw |
| river | yes | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | |
| cycleway | | no | | x |
| runway | | | yes | |
| cycleway | | | no | x |
| cycleway | | | no | x |