Spelling: Hierachy vs Hierarchy
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
|
||||
Background:
|
||||
Given the profile "bicycle"
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on ways
|
||||
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierarchy on ways
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
|
||||
| | | | | x |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
Background:
|
||||
Given the profile "bicycle"
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on nodes
|
||||
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | node/highway | bothw |
|
||||
| | | | | x |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Car - Restricted access
|
||||
Background:
|
||||
Given the profile "car"
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierachy on ways
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on ways
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
|
||||
| | | | | x |
|
||||
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Feature: Car - Restricted access
|
||||
| | | no | yes | x |
|
||||
| | | yes | no | |
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierachy on nodes
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
|
||||
| | | | | x |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on ways
|
||||
Background:
|
||||
Given the profile "foot"
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierachy on ways
|
||||
Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierarchy on ways
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| highway | access | foot | bothw |
|
||||
| footway | | | x |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on nodes
|
||||
Background:
|
||||
Given the profile "foot"
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierachy on nodes
|
||||
Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
|
||||
Then routability should be
|
||||
| node/access | node/foot | bothw |
|
||||
| | | x |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user