cleanup indentation of cuke files

This commit is contained in:
Emil Tin
2013-08-29 19:29:13 +02:00
parent 58b7ef8431
commit b5bfdb56dc
63 changed files with 4486 additions and 4509 deletions
+15 -15
View File
@@ -2,19 +2,19 @@
Feature: Foot - Ignore max speed restrictions
Background: Use specific speeds
Given the profile "foot"
Given the profile "foot"
@todo
Scenario: Foot - Ignore maxspeed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 100 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1mph | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 mph | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1unknown | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 unknown | 145s ~10% |
| residential | none | 145s ~10% |
| residential | signals | 145s ~10% |
@todo
Scenario: Foot - Ignore maxspeed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 100 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1mph | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 mph | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1unknown | 145s ~10% |
| residential | 1 unknown | 145s ~10% |
| residential | none | 145s ~10% |
| residential | signals | 145s ~10% |
+54 -54
View File
@@ -2,59 +2,59 @@
Feature: Foot - Oneway streets
Handle oneways streets, as defined at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
Background:
Given the profile "foot"
Scenario: Foot - Walking should not be affected by oneways
Then routability should be
| oneway | bothw |
| | x |
| nonsense | x |
| no | x |
| false | x |
| 0 | x |
| yes | x |
| true | x |
| 1 | x |
| -1 | x |
Background:
Given the profile "foot"
Scenario: Foot - Walking and roundabouts
Then routability should be
| junction | bothw |
| roundarout | x |
Scenario: Foot - Walking should not be affected by oneways
Then routability should be
| oneway | bothw |
| | x |
| nonsense | x |
| no | x |
| false | x |
| 0 | x |
| yes | x |
| true | x |
| 1 | x |
| -1 | x |
Scenario: Foot - Oneway:foot tag should not cause walking on big roads
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway:foot | bothw |
| footway | | x |
| motorway | yes | |
| motorway_link | yes | |
| trunk | yes | |
| trunk_link | yes | |
| motorway | no | |
| motorway_link | no | |
| trunk | no | |
| trunk_link | no | |
| motorway | -1 | |
| motorway_link | -1 | |
| trunk | -1 | |
| trunk_link | -1 | |
Scenario: Foot - Walking should respect oneway:foot
Then routability should be
| oneway:foot | oneway | junction | forw | backw |
| yes | | | x | |
| yes | yes | | x | |
| yes | no | | x | |
| yes | -1 | | x | |
| yes | | roundabout | x | |
| no | | | x | x |
| no | yes | | x | x |
| no | no | | x | x |
| no | -1 | | x | x |
| no | | roundabout | x | x |
| -1 | | | | x |
| -1 | yes | | | x |
| -1 | no | | | x |
| -1 | -1 | | | x |
| -1 | | roundabout | | x |
Scenario: Foot - Walking and roundabouts
Then routability should be
| junction | bothw |
| roundarout | x |
Scenario: Foot - Oneway:foot tag should not cause walking on big roads
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway:foot | bothw |
| footway | | x |
| motorway | yes | |
| motorway_link | yes | |
| trunk | yes | |
| trunk_link | yes | |
| motorway | no | |
| motorway_link | no | |
| trunk | no | |
| trunk_link | no | |
| motorway | -1 | |
| motorway_link | -1 | |
| trunk | -1 | |
| trunk_link | -1 | |
Scenario: Foot - Walking should respect oneway:foot
Then routability should be
| oneway:foot | oneway | junction | forw | backw |
| yes | | | x | |
| yes | yes | | x | |
| yes | no | | x | |
| yes | -1 | | x | |
| yes | | roundabout | x | |
| no | | | x | x |
| no | yes | | x | x |
| no | no | | x | x |
| no | -1 | | x | x |
| no | | roundabout | x | x |
| -1 | | | | x |
| -1 | yes | | | x |
| -1 | no | | | x |
| -1 | -1 | | | x |
| -1 | | roundabout | | x |
+28 -28
View File
@@ -1,32 +1,32 @@
@routing @foot @way
Feature: Foot - Accessability of different way types
Background:
Given the profile "foot"
Background:
Given the profile "foot"
Scenario: Foot - Basic access
Then routability should be
| highway | forw |
| motorway | |
| motorway_link | |
| trunk | |
| trunk_link | |
| primary | x |
| primary_link | x |
| secondary | x |
| secondary_link | x |
| tertiary | x |
| tertiary_link | x |
| residential | x |
| service | x |
| unclassified | x |
| living_street | x |
| road | x |
| track | x |
| path | x |
| footway | x |
| pedestrian | x |
| steps | x |
| pier | x |
| cycleway | |
| bridleway | |
Scenario: Foot - Basic access
Then routability should be
| highway | forw |
| motorway | |
| motorway_link | |
| trunk | |
| trunk_link | |
| primary | x |
| primary_link | x |
| secondary | x |
| secondary_link | x |
| tertiary | x |
| tertiary_link | x |
| residential | x |
| service | x |
| unclassified | x |
| living_street | x |
| road | x |
| track | x |
| path | x |
| footway | x |
| pedestrian | x |
| steps | x |
| pier | x |
| cycleway | |
| bridleway | |