Open-Harbor/osrm-backend
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity

cleanup indentation of cuke files

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Emil Tin
2013-08-29 19:29:13 +02:00
parent 58b7ef8431
commit b5bfdb56dc
63 changed files with 4486 additions and 4509 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
features/bicycle/access.feature
+160 -160
View File
@@ -2,172 +2,172 @@
Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
| runway | | | | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | no | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | no | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | yes | x |
| runway | | | no | |
| runway | no | | yes | x |
| runway | yes | | no | |
| runway | | no | yes | x |
| runway | | yes | no | |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
| runway | | | | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | no | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | no | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | yes | x |
| runway | | | no | |
| runway | no | | yes | x |
| runway | yes | | no | |
| runway | | no | yes | x |
| runway | | yes | no | |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in forward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | x | |
| | yes | | | x | |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | x | |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | x | |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | x | |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | x | |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | x | |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | x | |
| runway | yes | | | x | |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x | |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x | |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | x | |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | x | |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | x | |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in forward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | x | |
| | yes | | | x | |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | x | |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | x | |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | x | |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | x | |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | x | |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | x | |
| runway | yes | | | x | |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | x | |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | x | |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | x | |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | x | |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | x | |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in backward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | | x |
| | yes | | | | x |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | | x |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | | x |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | | x |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | | x |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | | x |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | | x |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | | x |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag in backward direction
Then routability should be
| highway | access:forward | vehicle:forward | bicycle:forward | forw | backw |
| | | | | | x |
| | yes | | | | x |
| | no | | | | |
| | | yes | | | x |
| | | no | | | |
| | no | yes | | | x |
| | yes | no | | | |
| | | | yes | | x |
| | | | no | | |
| | no | | yes | | x |
| | yes | | no | | |
| | | no | yes | | x |
| | | yes | no | | |
| runway | | | | | x |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | no | | | | |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | no | | | |
| runway | no | yes | | | x |
| runway | yes | no | | | |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | no | | |
| runway | no | | yes | | x |
| runway | yes | | no | | |
| runway | | no | yes | | x |
| runway | | yes | no | | |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on ways
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| permissive | | | x |
| designated | | | x |
| some_tag | | | x |
| no | | | |
| private | | | |
| agricultural | | | |
| forestery | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | permissive | | x |
| | designated | | x |
| | some_tag | | x |
| | no | | |
| | private | | |
| | agricultural | | |
| | forestery | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | permissive | x |
| | | designated | x |
| | | some_tag | x |
| | | no | |
| | | private | |
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| permissive | | | x |
| designated | | | x |
| some_tag | | | x |
| no | | | |
| private | | | |
| agricultural | | | |
| forestery | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | permissive | | x |
| | designated | | x |
| | some_tag | | x |
| | no | | |
| | private | | |
| | agricultural | | |
| | forestery | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | permissive | x |
| | | designated | x |
| | | some_tag | x |
| | | no | |
| | | private | |
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on both node and way
Then routability should be
| access | node/access | bothw |
| yes | yes | x |
| yes | no | |
| yes | some_tag | x |
| no | yes | |
| no | no | |
| no | some_tag | |
| some_tag | yes | x |
| some_tag | no | |
| some_tag | some_tag | x |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on both node and way
Then routability should be
| access | node/access | bothw |
| yes | yes | x |
| yes | no | |
| yes | some_tag | x |
| no | yes | |
| no | no | |
| no | some_tag | |
| some_tag | yes | x |
| some_tag | no | |
| some_tag | some_tag | x |
Scenario: Bike - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| runway | private | | yes | x |
| footway | | no | permissive | x |
| motorway | | | yes | x |
| track | forestry | | permissive | x |
| cycleway | yes | designated | no | |
| primary | | yes | private | |
| residential | permissive | | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Access combinations
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| runway | private | | yes | x |
| footway | | no | permissive | x |
| motorway | | | yes | x |
| track | forestry | | permissive | x |
| cycleway | yes | designated | no | |
| primary | | yes | private | |
| residential | permissive | | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Ignore access tags for other modes
Then routability should be
| highway | boat | motor_vehicle | moped | bothw |
| river | yes | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | |
| cycleway | | no | | x |
| runway | | | yes | |
| cycleway | | | no | x |
Scenario: Bike - Ignore access tags for other modes
Then routability should be
| highway | boat | motor_vehicle | moped | bothw |
| river | yes | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | |
| cycleway | | no | | x |
| runway | | | yes | |
| cycleway | | | no | x |
features/bicycle/access_node.feature
+57 -57
View File
@@ -2,63 +2,63 @@
Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| no | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | no | | |
| no | yes | | x |
| yes | no | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | no | |
| no | | yes | x |
| yes | | no | |
| | no | yes | x |
| | yes | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| no | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | no | | |
| no | yes | | x |
| yes | no | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | no | |
| no | | yes | x |
| yes | | no | |
| | no | yes | x |
| | yes | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on nodes
Then routability should be
| highway | node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | |
| runway | | yes | | |
| runway | | | yes | |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess on nodes
Then routability should be
| highway | node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | |
| runway | | yes | | |
| runway | | | yes | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| permissive | | | x |
| designated | | | x |
| some_tag | | | x |
| no | | | |
| private | | | |
| agricultural | | | |
| forestery | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | permissive | | x |
| | designated | | x |
| | some_tag | | x |
| | no | | |
| | private | | |
| | agricultural | | |
| | forestery | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | permissive | x |
| | | designated | x |
| | | some_tag | x |
| | | no | |
| | | private | |
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on nodes
Then routability should be
| node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | bothw |
| | | | x |
| yes | | | x |
| permissive | | | x |
| designated | | | x |
| some_tag | | | x |
| no | | | |
| private | | | |
| agricultural | | | |
| forestery | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| | permissive | | x |
| | designated | | x |
| | some_tag | | x |
| | no | | |
| | private | | |
| | agricultural | | |
| | forestery | | |
| | | yes | x |
| | | permissive | x |
| | | designated | x |
| | | some_tag | x |
| | | no | |
| | | private | |
| | | agricultural | |
| | | forestery | |
features/bicycle/area.feature
+93 -93
View File
@@ -1,103 +1,103 @@
@routing @bicycle @area
Feature: Bike - Squares and other areas
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
@square
Scenario: Bike - Route along edge of a squares
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
And the ways
| nodes | area | highway |
| xa | | primary |
| abcda | yes | residential |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
@building
Scenario: Bike - Don't route on buildings
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
@square
Scenario: Bike - Route along edge of a squares
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area | building | access |
| xa | primary | | | |
| abcda | (nil) | yes | yes | yes |
And the ways
| nodes | area | highway |
| xa | | primary |
| abcda | yes | residential |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | xa |
| a | d | xa |
| b | c | xa |
| c | b | xa |
| c | d | xa |
| d | c | xa |
| d | a | xa |
| a | d | xa |
@parking
Scenario: Bike - parking areas
Given the node map
| e | | | f |
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | amenity |
| xa | primary | |
| by | primary | |
| xefy | primary | |
| abcda | (nil) | parking |
@building
Scenario: Bike - Don't route on buildings
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xa,abcda,by |
| y | x | by,abcda,xa |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
@train @platform
Scenario: Bike - railway platforms
Given the node map
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area | building | access |
| xa | primary | | | |
| abcda | (nil) | yes | yes | yes |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | railway |
| xa | primary | |
| by | primary | |
| abcda | (nil) | platform |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | xa |
| a | d | xa |
| b | c | xa |
| c | b | xa |
| c | d | xa |
| d | c | xa |
| d | a | xa |
| a | d | xa |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xa,abcda,by |
| y | x | by,abcda,xa |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
@parking
Scenario: Bike - parking areas
Given the node map
| e | | | f |
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | amenity |
| xa | primary | |
| by | primary | |
| xefy | primary | |
| abcda | (nil) | parking |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xa,abcda,by |
| y | x | by,abcda,xa |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
@train @platform
Scenario: Bike - railway platforms
Given the node map
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | railway |
| xa | primary | |
| by | primary | |
| abcda | (nil) | platform |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xa,abcda,by |
| y | x | by,abcda,xa |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
features/bicycle/barrier.feature
+34 -34
View File
@@ -1,39 +1,39 @@
@routing @bicycle @barrier
Feature: Barriers
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Barriers
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | bothw |
| | x |
| bollard | x |
| gate | x |
| cycle_barrier | x |
| cattle_grid | x |
| border_control | x |
| toll_booth | x |
| sally_port | x |
| entrance | x |
| wall | |
| fence | |
| some_tag | |
Scenario: Bike - Barriers
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | bothw |
| | x |
| bollard | x |
| gate | x |
| cycle_barrier | x |
| cattle_grid | x |
| border_control | x |
| toll_booth | x |
| sally_port | x |
| entrance | x |
| wall | |
| fence | |
| some_tag | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag trumphs barriers
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | node/access | bothw |
| bollard | | x |
| bollard | yes | x |
| bollard | permissive | x |
| bollard | designated | x |
| bollard | no | |
| bollard | private | |
| bollard | agricultural | |
| wall | | |
| wall | yes | x |
| wall | permissive | x |
| wall | designated | x |
| wall | no | |
| wall | private | |
| wall | agricultural | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tag trumphs barriers
Then routability should be
| node/barrier | node/access | bothw |
| bollard | | x |
| bollard | yes | x |
| bollard | permissive | x |
| bollard | designated | x |
| bollard | no | |
| bollard | private | |
| bollard | agricultural | |
| wall | | |
| wall | yes | x |
| wall | permissive | x |
| wall | designated | x |
| wall | no | |
| wall | private | |
| wall | agricultural | |
features/bicycle/cycleway.feature
+74 -74
View File
@@ -2,80 +2,80 @@
Feature: Bike - Cycle tracks/lanes
Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Cycle tracks/lanes should enable biking
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | bothw |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | track | x |
| motorway | lane | x |
| motorway | shared | x |
| motorway | share_busway | x |
| motorway | sharrow | x |
| some_tag | track | x |
| some_tag | lane | x |
| some_tag | shared | x |
| some_tag | share_busway | x |
| some_tag | sharrow | x |
| residential | track | x |
| residential | lane | x |
| residential | shared | x |
| residential | share_busway | x |
| residential | sharrow | x |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Left/right side cycleways on implied bidirectionals
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
| primary | | | | x | x |
| primary | track | | | x | x |
| primary | opposite | | | x | x |
| primary | | track | | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | | x | x |
| primary | | | track | x | x |
| primary | | | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | track | track | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | track | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | track | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Cycle tracks/lanes should enable biking
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | bothw |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | track | x |
| motorway | lane | x |
| motorway | shared | x |
| motorway | share_busway | x |
| motorway | sharrow | x |
| some_tag | track | x |
| some_tag | lane | x |
| some_tag | shared | x |
| some_tag | share_busway | x |
| some_tag | sharrow | x |
| residential | track | x |
| residential | lane | x |
| residential | shared | x |
| residential | share_busway | x |
| residential | sharrow | x |
Scenario: Bike - Left/right side cycleways on implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
| primary | | | | x | x |
| motorway | | | | | |
| motorway | track | | | x | |
| motorway | opposite | | | | x |
| motorway | | track | | | x |
| motorway | | opposite | | | x |
| motorway | | | track | x | |
| motorway | | | opposite | x | |
| motorway | | track | track | x | x |
| motorway | | opposite | opposite | x | x |
| motorway | | track | opposite | x | x |
| motorway | | opposite | track | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Left/right side cycleways on implied bidirectionals
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
| primary | | | | x | x |
| primary | track | | | x | x |
| primary | opposite | | | x | x |
| primary | | track | | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | | x | x |
| primary | | | track | x | x |
| primary | | | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | track | track | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | track | opposite | x | x |
| primary | | opposite | track | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Invalid cycleway tags
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | bothw |
| primary | | x |
| primary | yes | x |
| primary | no | x |
| primary | some_track | x |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | yes | |
| motorway | no | |
| motorway | some_track | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags should overwrite cycleway access
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | access | bothw |
| motorway | track | no | |
| residential | track | no | |
| footway | track | no | |
| cycleway | track | no | |
| motorway | lane | yes | x |
| residential | lane | yes | x |
| footway | lane | yes | x |
| cycleway | lane | yes | x |
Scenario: Bike - Left/right side cycleways on implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | cycleway:left | cycleway:right | forw | backw |
| primary | | | | x | x |
| motorway | | | | | |
| motorway | track | | | x | |
| motorway | opposite | | | | x |
| motorway | | track | | | x |
| motorway | | opposite | | | x |
| motorway | | | track | x | |
| motorway | | | opposite | x | |
| motorway | | track | track | x | x |
| motorway | | opposite | opposite | x | x |
| motorway | | track | opposite | x | x |
| motorway | | opposite | track | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Invalid cycleway tags
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | bothw |
| primary | | x |
| primary | yes | x |
| primary | no | x |
| primary | some_track | x |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | yes | |
| motorway | no | |
| motorway | some_track | |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags should overwrite cycleway access
Then routability should be
| highway | cycleway | access | bothw |
| motorway | track | no | |
| residential | track | no | |
| footway | track | no | |
| cycleway | track | no | |
| motorway | lane | yes | x |
| residential | lane | yes | x |
| footway | lane | yes | x |
| cycleway | lane | yes | x |
features/bicycle/destination.feature
+67 -67
View File
@@ -1,77 +1,77 @@
@routing @bicycle @destination @todo
Feature: Bike - Destination only, no passing through
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Destination only street
Given the node map
| a | | | | e |
| | b | c | d | |
| | | | | |
| x | | | | y |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | |
| bcd | destination |
| de | |
| axye | |
Scenario: Bike - Destination only street
Given the node map
| a | | | | e |
| | b | c | d | |
| | | | | |
| x | | | | y |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| a | c | ab,bcd |
| a | d | ab,bcd |
| a | e | axye |
| e | d | de |
| e | c | de,bcd |
| e | b | de,bcd |
| e | a | axye |
Scenario: Bike - Destination only street
Given the node map
| a | | | | e |
| | b | c | d | |
| | | | | |
| x | | | | y |
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | |
| bcd | destination |
| de | |
| axye | |
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | |
| bc | destination |
| cd | destination |
| de | |
| axye | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| a | c | ab,bcd |
| a | d | ab,bcd |
| a | e | axye |
| e | d | de |
| e | c | de,bcd |
| e | b | de,bcd |
| e | a | axye |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| a | c | ab,bc |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd |
| a | e | axye |
| e | d | de |
| e | c | de,dc |
| e | b | de,dc,bc |
| e | a | axye |
Scenario: Bike - Destination only street
Given the node map
| a | | | | e |
| | b | c | d | |
| | | | | |
| x | | | | y |
Scenario: Bike - Routing inside a destination only area
Given the node map
| a | | c | | e |
| | b | | d | |
| x | | | | y |
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | |
| bc | destination |
| cd | destination |
| de | |
| axye | |
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | destination |
| bc | destination |
| cd | destination |
| de | destination |
| axye | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| a | c | ab,bc |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd |
| a | e | axye |
| e | d | de |
| e | c | de,dc |
| e | b | de,dc,bc |
| e | a | axye |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | e | ab,bc,cd,de |
| e | a | de,cd,bc,ab |
| b | d | bc,cd |
| d | b | cd,bc |
Scenario: Bike - Routing inside a destination only area
Given the node map
| a | | c | | e |
| | b | | d | |
| x | | | | y |
And the ways
| nodes | access |
| ab | destination |
| bc | destination |
| cd | destination |
| de | destination |
| axye | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | e | ab,bc,cd,de |
| e | a | de,cd,bc,ab |
| b | d | bc,cd |
| d | b | cd,bc |
features/bicycle/ferry.feature
+56 -56
View File
@@ -1,63 +1,63 @@
@routing @bicycle @ferry
Feature: Bike - Handle ferry routes
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Ferry route
Given the node map
| a | b | c | | |
| | | d | | |
| | | e | f | g |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle |
| abc | primary | | |
| cde | | ferry | yes |
| efg | primary | | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | g | abc,cde,efg |
| b | f | abc,cde,efg |
| e | c | cde |
| e | b | cde,abc |
| e | a | cde,abc |
| c | e | cde |
| c | f | cde,efg |
| c | g | cde,efg |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Ferry duration, single node
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
| | | e | f |
| | | g | h |
| | | i | j |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle | duration |
| ab | primary | | | |
| cd | primary | | | |
| ef | primary | | | |
| gh | primary | | | |
| ij | primary | | | |
| bc | | ferry | yes | 0:01 |
| be | | ferry | yes | 0:10 |
| bg | | ferry | yes | 1:00 |
| bi | | ferry | yes | 10:00 |
Scenario: Bike - Ferry route
Given the node map
| a | b | c | | |
| | | d | | |
| | | e | f | g |
Scenario: Bike - Ferry duration, multiple nodes
Given the node map
| x | | | | | y |
| | a | b | c | d | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle |
| abc | primary | | |
| cde | | ferry | yes |
| efg | primary | | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle | duration |
| xa | primary | | | |
| yd | primary | | | |
| abcd | | ferry | yes | 1:00 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | g | abc,cde,efg |
| b | f | abc,cde,efg |
| e | c | cde |
| e | b | cde,abc |
| e | a | cde,abc |
| c | e | cde |
| c | f | cde,efg |
| c | g | cde,efg |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | d | abcd | 3600s +-10 |
| d | a | abcd | 3600s +-10 |
Scenario: Bike - Ferry duration, single node
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
| | | e | f |
| | | g | h |
| | | i | j |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle | duration |
| ab | primary | | | |
| cd | primary | | | |
| ef | primary | | | |
| gh | primary | | | |
| ij | primary | | | |
| bc | | ferry | yes | 0:01 |
| be | | ferry | yes | 0:10 |
| bg | | ferry | yes | 1:00 |
| bi | | ferry | yes | 10:00 |
Scenario: Bike - Ferry duration, multiple nodes
Given the node map
| x | | | | | y |
| | a | b | c | d | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | bicycle | duration |
| xa | primary | | | |
| yd | primary | | | |
| abcd | | ferry | yes | 1:00 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | d | abcd | 3600s +-10 |
| d | a | abcd | 3600s +-10 |
features/bicycle/maxspeed.feature
+71 -71
View File
@@ -1,87 +1,87 @@
@routing @maxspeed @bicycle
Feature: Bike - Max speed restrictions
Background: Use specific speeds
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background: Use specific speeds
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bicycle - Respect maxspeeds when lower that way type speed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 10 | 72s ~10% |
Scenario: Bicycle - Respect maxspeeds when lower that way type speed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 10 | 72s ~10% |
Scenario: Bicycle - Ignore maxspeed when higher than way speed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 80 | 49s ~10% |
Scenario: Bicycle - Ignore maxspeed when higher than way speed
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 80 | 49s ~10% |
@todo
Scenario: Bicycle - Maxspeed formats
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 5 | 144s ~10% |
| residential | 5mph | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5 mph | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5MPH | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5 MPH | 90s ~10% |
| trunk | 5unknown | 49s ~10% |
| trunk | 5 unknown | 49s ~10% |
Scenario: Bicycle - Maxspeed formats
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | 5 | 144s ~10% |
| residential | 5mph | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5 mph | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5MPH | 90s ~10% |
| residential | 5 MPH | 90s ~10% |
| trunk | 5unknown | 49s ~10% |
| trunk | 5 unknown | 49s ~10% |
@todo
Scenario: Bicycle - Maxspeed special tags
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | none | 49s ~10% |
| residential | signals | 49s ~10% |
Scenario: Bicycle - Maxspeed special tags
Then routability should be
| highway | maxspeed | bothw |
| residential | | 49s ~10% |
| residential | none | 49s ~10% |
| residential | signals | 49s ~10% |
Scenario: Bike - Do not use maxspeed when higher that way type speed
Given the node map
| a | b | c |
Scenario: Bike - Do not use maxspeed when higher that way type speed
Given the node map
| a | b | c |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | maxspeed |
| ab | residential | |
| bc | residential | 80 |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | maxspeed |
| ab | residential | |
| bc | residential | 80 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | b | ab | 24s ~5% |
| b | c | bc | 24s ~5% |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time |
| a | b | ab | 24s ~5% |
| b | c | bc | 24s ~5% |
Scenario: Bike - Forward/backward maxspeed
Scenario: Bike - Forward/backward maxspeed
Given the shortcuts
| key | value |
| bike | 49s ~10% |
| run | 73s ~10% |
| walk | 145s ~10% |
| snail | 720s ~10% |
| key | value |
| bike | 49s ~10% |
| run | 73s ~10% |
| walk | 145s ~10% |
| snail | 720s ~10% |
Then routability should be
| maxspeed | maxspeed:forward | maxspeed:backward | forw | backw |
| | | | bike | bike |
| 10 | | | run | run |
| | 10 | | run | bike |
| | | 10 | bike | run |
| 1 | 10 | | run | snail |
| 1 | | 10 | snail | run |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | walk | run |
Then routability should be
| maxspeed | maxspeed:forward | maxspeed:backward | forw | backw |
| | | | bike | bike |
| 10 | | | run | run |
| | 10 | | run | bike |
| | | 10 | bike | run |
| 1 | 10 | | run | snail |
| 1 | | 10 | snail | run |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | walk | run |
Scenario: Bike - Maxspeed should not allow routing on unroutable ways
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | access | maxspeed | maxspeed:forward | maxspeed:backward | bothw |
| primary | | | | | | x |
| secondary | | no | | | | |
| secondary | | no | 100 | | | |
| secondary | | no | | 100 | | |
| secondary | | no | | | 100 | |
| (nil) | train | | | | | |
| (nil) | train | | 100 | | | |
| (nil) | train | | | 100 | | |
| (nil) | train | | | | 100 | |
| runway | | | | | | |
| runway | | | 100 | | | |
| runway | | | | 100 | | |
| runway | | | | | 100 | |
Scenario: Bike - Maxspeed should not allow routing on unroutable ways
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | access | maxspeed | maxspeed:forward | maxspeed:backward | bothw |
| primary | | | | | | x |
| secondary | | no | | | | |
| secondary | | no | 100 | | | |
| secondary | | no | | 100 | | |
| secondary | | no | | | 100 | |
| (nil) | train | | | | | |
| (nil) | train | | 100 | | | |
| (nil) | train | | | 100 | | |
| (nil) | train | | | | 100 | |
| runway | | | | | | |
| runway | | | 100 | | | |
| runway | | | | 100 | | |
| runway | | | | | 100 | |
features/bicycle/mode.feature
+73 -73
View File
@@ -1,89 +1,89 @@
@routing @bicycle @mode
Feature: Bike - Mode flag
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when using a ferry
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | duration |
| ab | primary | | |
| bc | | ferry | 0:01 |
| cd | primary | | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | route | duration |
| ab | primary | | |
| bc | | ferry | 0:01 |
| cd | primary | | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left, destination | bike,ferry,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left, destination | bike,ferry,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | ferry,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,ferry |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,ferry |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | ferry,bike |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left, destination | bike,ferry,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left, destination | bike,ferry,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | ferry,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,ferry |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,ferry |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | ferry,bike |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing bike against oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing bike against oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | oneway |
| ab | primary | |
| bc | primary | yes |
| cd | primary | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | oneway |
| ab | primary | |
| bc | primary | yes |
| cd | primary | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | push,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | push,bike |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | push,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | push,bike |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing on pedestrain streets
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing on pedestrain streets
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
And the ways
| nodes | highway |
| ab | primary |
| bc | pedestrian |
| cd | primary |
And the ways
| nodes | highway |
| ab | primary |
| bc | pedestrian |
| cd | primary |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | push,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | push,bike |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns | modes |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,right,left,destination | bike,push,bike |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,left,destination | push,bike |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| a | c | ab,bc | head,right,destination | bike,push |
| b | d | bc,cd | head,left,destination | push,bike |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing on pedestrain areas
Given the node map
| a | b | | |
| | c | d | f |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Mode when pushing on pedestrain areas
Given the node map
| a | b | | |
| | c | d | f |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area |
| ab | primary | |
| bcd | pedestrian | yes |
| df | primary | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area |
| ab | primary | |
| bcd | pedestrian | yes |
| df | primary | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | modes |
| a | f | ab,bcd,df | bike,push,bike |
| f | a | df,bcd,ab | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | bcd,ab | push,bike |
| f | b | df,bcd | bike,push |
| a | d | ab,bcd | bike,push |
| b | f | bcd,df | push,bike |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | modes |
| a | f | ab,bcd,df | bike,push,bike |
| f | a | df,bcd,ab | bike,push,bike |
| d | a | bcd,ab | push,bike |
| f | b | df,bcd | bike,push |
| a | d | ab,bcd | bike,push |
| b | f | bcd,df | push,bike |
features/bicycle/names.feature
+41 -41
View File
@@ -1,49 +1,49 @@
@routing @bicycle @names
Feature: Bike - Street names in instructions
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - A named street
Given the node map
| a | b |
| | c |
And the ways
| nodes | name |
| ab | My Way |
| bc | Your Way |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | c | My Way,Your Way |
@unnamed
Scenario: Bike - Use way type to describe unnamed ways
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
And the ways
| nodes | highway | name |
| ab | cycleway | |
| bcd | track | |
Scenario: Bike - A named street
Given the node map
| a | b |
| | c |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | d | {highway:cycleway},{highway:track} |
And the ways
| nodes | name |
| ab | My Way |
| bc | Your Way |
@area @names @todo
Scenario: Bike - name on streets overlapping an area
Given the node map
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | c | My Way,Your Way |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area |
| xaby | residential | |
| abcda | residential | yes |
@unnamed
Scenario: Bike - Use way type to describe unnamed ways
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xaby |
| y | x | xaby |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | name |
| ab | cycleway | |
| bcd | track | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | d | {highway:cycleway},{highway:track} |
@area @names @todo
Scenario: Bike - name on streets overlapping an area
Given the node map
| x | a | b | y |
| | d | c | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | area |
| xaby | residential | |
| abcda | residential | yes |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| x | y | xaby |
| y | x | xaby |
features/bicycle/oneway.feature
+115 -115
View File
@@ -3,126 +3,126 @@ Feature: Bike - Oneway streets
Handle oneways streets, as defined at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
Usually we can push bikes against oneways, but we use foot=no to prevent this in these tests
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Simple oneway
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | yes | x | |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Simple reverse oneway
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Simple oneway
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | yes | x | |
Scenario: Bike - Around the Block
Given the node map
| a | b |
| d | c |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| ab | yes | no |
| bc | | no |
| cd | | no |
| da | | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| b | a | bc,cd,da |
Scenario: Bike - Handle various oneway tag values
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| no | | x | x |
| no | nonsense | x | x |
| no | no | x | x |
| no | false | x | x |
| no | 0 | x | x |
| no | yes | x | |
| no | true | x | |
| no | 1 | x | |
| no | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | junction | forw | backw |
| | no | | | x | x |
| | no | | roundabout | x | |
| motorway | no | yes | | x | |
| motorway_link | no | yes | | x | |
| motorway | no | yes | roundabout | x | |
| motorway_link | no | yes | roundabout | x | |
Scenario: Simple reverse oneway
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Overriding implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | junction | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | roundabout | no | x | x |
| primary | no | roundabout | yes | x | |
| motorway_link | no | | -1 | | |
| trunk_link | no | | -1 | | |
| primary | no | roundabout | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Oneway:bicycle should override normal oneways tags
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway:bicycle | oneway | junction | forw | backw |
| no | yes | | | x | |
| no | yes | yes | | x | |
| no | yes | no | | x | |
| no | yes | -1 | | x | |
| no | yes | | roundabout | x | |
| no | no | | | x | x |
| no | no | yes | | x | x |
| no | no | no | | x | x |
| no | no | -1 | | x | x |
| no | no | | roundabout | x | x |
| no | -1 | | | | x |
| no | -1 | yes | | | x |
| no | -1 | no | | | x |
| no | -1 | -1 | | | x |
| no | -1 | | roundabout | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Contra flow
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway | cycleway | forw | backw |
| no | yes | opposite | x | x |
| no | yes | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | yes | opposite_lane | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite_lane | x | x |
| no | no | opposite | x | x |
| no | no | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | no | opposite_lane | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Around the Block
Given the node map
| a | b |
| d | c |
Scenario: Bike - Should not be affected by car tags
Then routability should be
| foot | junction | oneway | oneway:car | forw | backw |
| no | | yes | yes | x | |
| no | | yes | no | x | |
| no | | yes | -1 | x | |
| no | | no | yes | x | x |
| no | | no | no | x | x |
| no | | no | -1 | x | x |
| no | | -1 | yes | | x |
| no | | -1 | no | | x |
| no | | -1 | -1 | | x |
| no | roundabout | | yes | x | |
| no | roundabout | | no | x | |
| no | roundabout | | -1 | x | |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| ab | yes | no |
| bc | | no |
| cd | | no |
| da | | no |
Scenario: Bike - Two consecutive oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | c |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | ab |
| b | a | bc,cd,da |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway |
| ab | yes |
| bc | yes |
Scenario: Bike - Handle various oneway tag values
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway | forw | backw |
| no | | x | x |
| no | nonsense | x | x |
| no | no | x | x |
| no | false | x | x |
| no | 0 | x | x |
| no | yes | x | |
| no | true | x | |
| no | 1 | x | |
| no | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | junction | forw | backw |
| | no | | | x | x |
| | no | | roundabout | x | |
| motorway | no | yes | | x | |
| motorway_link | no | yes | | x | |
| motorway | no | yes | roundabout | x | |
| motorway_link | no | yes | roundabout | x | |
Scenario: Bike - Overriding implied oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | junction | oneway | forw | backw |
| primary | no | roundabout | no | x | x |
| primary | no | roundabout | yes | x | |
| motorway_link | no | | -1 | | |
| trunk_link | no | | -1 | | |
| primary | no | roundabout | -1 | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Oneway:bicycle should override normal oneways tags
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway:bicycle | oneway | junction | forw | backw |
| no | yes | | | x | |
| no | yes | yes | | x | |
| no | yes | no | | x | |
| no | yes | -1 | | x | |
| no | yes | | roundabout | x | |
| no | no | | | x | x |
| no | no | yes | | x | x |
| no | no | no | | x | x |
| no | no | -1 | | x | x |
| no | no | | roundabout | x | x |
| no | -1 | | | | x |
| no | -1 | yes | | | x |
| no | -1 | no | | | x |
| no | -1 | -1 | | | x |
| no | -1 | | roundabout | | x |
Scenario: Bike - Contra flow
Then routability should be
| foot | oneway | cycleway | forw | backw |
| no | yes | opposite | x | x |
| no | yes | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | yes | opposite_lane | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | -1 | opposite_lane | x | x |
| no | no | opposite | x | x |
| no | no | opposite_track | x | x |
| no | no | opposite_lane | x | x |
Scenario: Bike - Should not be affected by car tags
Then routability should be
| foot | junction | oneway | oneway:car | forw | backw |
| no | | yes | yes | x | |
| no | | yes | no | x | |
| no | | yes | -1 | x | |
| no | | no | yes | x | x |
| no | | no | no | x | x |
| no | | no | -1 | x | x |
| no | | -1 | yes | | x |
| no | | -1 | no | | x |
| no | | -1 | -1 | | x |
| no | roundabout | | yes | x | |
| no | roundabout | | no | x | |
| no | roundabout | | -1 | x | |
Scenario: Bike - Two consecutive oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | c |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway |
| ab | yes |
| bc | yes |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | c | ab,bc |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | c | ab,bc |
features/bicycle/pushing.feature
+100 -100
View File
@@ -1,124 +1,124 @@
@routing @bicycle @pushing
Feature: Bike - Accessability of different way types
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Given the shortcuts
| key | value |
| bike | 49s ~20% |
| foot | 121s ~20% |
| key | value |
| bike | 49s ~20% |
| foot | 121s ~20% |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on pedestrian-only ways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| cycleway | | bike | bike |
| primary | | bike | bike |
| pedestrian | | foot | foot |
| footway | | foot | foot |
| primary | yes | bike | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on pedestrian-only ways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| cycleway | | bike | bike |
| primary | | bike | bike |
| pedestrian | | foot | foot |
| footway | | foot | foot |
| primary | yes | bike | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes against normal oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| primary | yes | bike | foot |
| pedestrian | yes | foot | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes against normal oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| primary | yes | bike | foot |
| pedestrian | yes | foot | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes against reverse oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| primary | -1 | foot | bike |
| pedestrian | -1 | foot | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes against reverse oneways
Then routability should be
| highway | oneway | forw | backw |
| (nil) | | | |
| primary | -1 | foot | bike |
| pedestrian | -1 | foot | foot |
@square
Scenario: Bike - Push bikes on pedestrian areas
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
@square
Scenario: Bike - Push bikes on pedestrian areas
Given the node map
| x | |
| a | b |
| d | c |
And the ways
| nodes | area | highway |
| xa | | primary |
| abcda | yes | pedestrian |
And the ways
| nodes | area | highway |
| xa | | primary |
| abcda | yes | pedestrian |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
| b | c | abcda |
| c | b | abcda |
| c | d | abcda |
| d | c | abcda |
| d | a | abcda |
| a | d | abcda |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on ways with foot=yes
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bothw |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | yes | foot |
| runway | | |
| runway | yes | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on ways with foot=yes
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bothw |
| motorway | | |
| motorway | yes | foot |
| runway | | |
| runway | yes | foot |
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on ways with foot=yes in one direction
Then routability should be
| highway | foot:forward | foot:backward | forw | backw |
| motorway | | | | |
| motorway | yes | | foot | |
| motorway | | yes | | foot |
Scenario: Bike - Pushing bikes on ways with foot=yes in one direction
Then routability should be
| highway | foot:forward | foot:backward | forw | backw |
| motorway | | | | |
| motorway | yes | | foot | |
| motorway | | yes | | foot |
@construction
Scenario: Bike - Don't allow routing on ways still under construction
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| construction | | | |
| construction | yes | | |
| construction | | yes | |
Scenario: Bike - Don't allow routing on ways still under construction
Then routability should be
| highway | foot | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| construction | | | |
| construction | yes | | |
| construction | | yes | |
@roundabout
Scenario: Bike - Don't push bikes against oneway flow on roundabouts
Then routability should be
| junction | forw | backw |
| roundabout | x | |
Scenario: Bike - Don't push bikes against oneway flow on roundabouts
Then routability should be
| junction | forw | backw |
| roundabout | x | |
Scenario: Bike - Instructions when pushing bike on oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
Scenario: Bike - Instructions when pushing bike on oneways
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | oneway |
| ab | primary | |
| bc | primary | yes |
| cd | primary | |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | oneway |
| ab | primary | |
| bc | primary | yes |
| cd | primary | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,enter_contraflow,leave_contraflow,destination |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,leave_contraflow,destination |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,enter_contraflow,destination |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,enter_contraflow,leave_contraflow,destination |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,leave_contraflow,destination |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,enter_contraflow,destination |
@todo
@todo
Scenario: Bike - Instructions when pushing bike on footway/pedestrian, etc.
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
Given the node map
| a | b | |
| | c | d |
And the ways
| nodes | highway |
| ab | primary |
| bc | footway |
| cd | primary |
And the ways
| nodes | highway |
| ab | primary |
| bc | footway |
| cd | primary |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,enter_contraflow,leave_contraflow,destination |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,leave_contraflow,destination |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,enter_contraflow,destination |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| a | d | ab,bc,cd | head,right,left,destination |
| d | a | cd,bc,ab | head,enter_contraflow,leave_contraflow,destination |
| c | a | bc,ab | head,leave_contraflow,destination |
| d | b | cd,bc | head,enter_contraflow,destination |
features/bicycle/ref.feature
+32 -32
View File
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
@routing @bicycle @ref @name
Feature: Bike - Way ref
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Way with both name and ref
Given the node map
| a | b |
And the ways
| nodes | name | ref |
| ab | Utopia Drive | E7 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | Utopia Drive / E7 |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Way with only ref
Given the node map
| a | b |
Scenario: Bike - Way with both name and ref
Given the node map
| a | b |
And the ways
| nodes | name | ref |
| ab | | E7 |
And the ways
| nodes | name | ref |
| ab | Utopia Drive | E7 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | E7 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | Utopia Drive / E7 |
Scenario: Bike - Way with only name
Given the node map
| a | b |
Scenario: Bike - Way with only ref
Given the node map
| a | b |
And the ways
| nodes | name |
| ab | Utopia Drive |
And the ways
| nodes | name | ref |
| ab | | E7 |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | Utopia Drive |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | E7 |
Scenario: Bike - Way with only name
Given the node map
| a | b |
And the ways
| nodes | name |
| ab | Utopia Drive |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | b | Utopia Drive |
features/bicycle/restrictions.feature
+245 -245
View File
@@ -1,289 +1,289 @@
@routing @bicycle @restrictions
Feature: Bike - Turn restrictions
Ignore turn restrictions on bicycle, since you always become a temporary pedestrian.
Note that if u-turns are allowed, turn restrictions can lead to suprising, but correct, routes.
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No left turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
Ignore turn restrictions on bicycle, since you always become a temporary pedestrian.
Note that if u-turns are allowed, turn restrictions can lead to suprising, but correct, routes.
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_left_turn |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No left turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No right turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_left_turn |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | ej | j | no_right_turn |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No right turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No u-turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | ej | j | no_right_turn |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_u_turn |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - No u-turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - Handle any no_* relation
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_u_turn |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_weird_zigzags |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - Handle any no_* relation
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only left turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | no_weird_zigzags |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | only_left_turn |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only left turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only right turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | wj | j | only_left_turn |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | ej | j | only_right_turn |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only right turn
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only straight on
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | ej | j | only_right_turn |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | nj | j | only_straight_on |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
@only_turning
Scenario: Bike - Only straight on
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - Handle any only_* restriction
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | nj | j | only_straight_on |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | nj | j | only_weird_zigzags |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
@no_turning
Scenario: Bike - Handle any only_* restriction
Given the node map
| | n | |
| w | j | e |
| | s | |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Except tag and on no_ restrictions
Given the node map
| b | x | c |
| a | j | d |
| | s | |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| nj | -1 | no |
| wj | -1 | no |
| ej | -1 | no |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | no | no |
| xj | -1 | no |
| aj | -1 | no |
| bj | no | no |
| cj | -1 | no |
| dj | -1 | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
| restriction | sj | nj | j | only_weird_zigzags |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | aj | j | no_left_turn | bicycle |
| restriction | sj | bj | j | no_left_turn | |
| restriction | sj | cj | j | no_right_turn | |
| restriction | sj | dj | j | no_right_turn | bicycle |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | w | sj,wj |
| s | n | sj,nj |
| s | e | sj,ej |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,aj |
| s | b | sj,bj |
| s | c | sj,cj |
| s | d | sj,dj |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Except tag and on no_ restrictions
Given the node map
| b | x | c |
| a | j | d |
| | s | |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Except tag and on only_ restrictions
Given the node map
| a | | b |
| | j | |
| | s | |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | no | no |
| xj | -1 | no |
| aj | -1 | no |
| bj | no | no |
| cj | -1 | no |
| dj | -1 | no |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| aj | no | no |
| bj | no | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | aj | j | no_left_turn | bicycle |
| restriction | sj | bj | j | no_left_turn | |
| restriction | sj | cj | j | no_right_turn | |
| restriction | sj | dj | j | no_right_turn | bicycle |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | aj | j | only_straight_on | bicycle |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,aj |
| s | b | sj,bj |
| s | c | sj,cj |
| s | d | sj,dj |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,aj |
| s | b | sj,bj |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Except tag and on only_ restrictions
Given the node map
| a | | b |
| | j | |
| | s | |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Multiple except tag values
Given the node map
| s | j | a |
| | | b |
| | | c |
| | | d |
| | | e |
| | | f |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| aj | no | no |
| bj | no | no |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| ja | yes | no |
| jb | yes | no |
| jc | yes | no |
| jd | yes | no |
| je | yes | no |
| jf | yes | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | aj | j | only_straight_on | bicycle |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | ja | j | no_straight_on | |
| restriction | sj | jb | j | no_straight_on | bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jc | j | no_straight_on | bus; bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jd | j | no_straight_on | bicycle; motocar |
| restriction | sj | je | j | no_straight_on | bus, bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jf | j | no_straight_on | bicycle, bus |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,aj |
| s | b | sj,bj |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,ja |
| s | b | sj,jb |
| s | c | sj,jc |
| s | d | sj,jd |
| s | e | sj,je |
| s | f | sj,jf |
@except
Scenario: Bike - Multiple except tag values
Given the node map
| s | j | a |
| | | b |
| | | c |
| | | d |
| | | e |
| | | f |
And the ways
| nodes | oneway | foot |
| sj | yes | no |
| ja | yes | no |
| jb | yes | no |
| jc | yes | no |
| jd | yes | no |
| je | yes | no |
| jf | yes | no |
And the relations
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction | except |
| restriction | sj | ja | j | no_straight_on | |
| restriction | sj | jb | j | no_straight_on | bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jc | j | no_straight_on | bus; bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jd | j | no_straight_on | bicycle; motocar |
| restriction | sj | je | j | no_straight_on | bus, bicycle |
| restriction | sj | jf | j | no_straight_on | bicycle, bus |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| s | a | sj,ja |
| s | b | sj,jb |
| s | c | sj,jc |
| s | d | sj,jd |
| s | e | sj,je |
| s | f | sj,jf |
features/bicycle/roundabout.feature
+27 -27
View File
@@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
@routing @bicycle @roundabout @instruction
Feature: Roundabout Instructions
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bicycle - Roundabout instructions
Given the node map
| | | v | | |
| | | d | | |
| s | a | | c | u |
| | | b | | |
| | | t | | |
And the ways
| nodes | junction |
| sa | |
| tb | |
| uc | |
| vd | |
| abcda | roundabout |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| s | t | sa,tb | head,enter_roundabout-1,destination |
| s | u | sa,uc | head,enter_roundabout-2,destination |
| s | v | sa,vd | head,enter_roundabout-3,destination |
| u | v | uc,vd | head,enter_roundabout-1,destination |
| u | s | uc,sa | head,enter_roundabout-2,destination |
| u | t | uc,tb | head,enter_roundabout-3,destination |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bicycle - Roundabout instructions
Given the node map
| | | v | | |
| | | d | | |
| s | a | | c | u |
| | | b | | |
| | | t | | |
And the ways
| nodes | junction |
| sa | |
| tb | |
| uc | |
| vd | |
| abcda | roundabout |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | turns |
| s | t | sa,tb | head,enter_roundabout-1,destination |
| s | u | sa,uc | head,enter_roundabout-2,destination |
| s | v | sa,vd | head,enter_roundabout-3,destination |
| u | v | uc,vd | head,enter_roundabout-1,destination |
| u | s | uc,sa | head,enter_roundabout-2,destination |
| u | t | uc,tb | head,enter_roundabout-3,destination |
features/bicycle/stop_area.feature
+27 -27
View File
@@ -3,35 +3,35 @@ Feature: Bike - Stop areas for public transport
Platforms and railway/bus lines are connected using a relation rather that a way, as specified in:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Platforms tagged using public_transport
Then routability should be
| highway | public_transport | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | platform | | x |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - railway platforms
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
| | s | t | |
Scenario: Bike - Platforms tagged using public_transport
Then routability should be
| highway | public_transport | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | platform | | x |
Scenario: Bike - railway platforms
Given the node map
| a | b | c | d |
| | s | t | |
And the nodes
| node | public_transport |
| c | stop_position |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | railway | bicycle | public_transport |
| abcd | (nil) | train | yes | |
| st | (nil) | (nil) | | platform |
| node | public_transport |
| c | stop_position |
And the relations
| type | public_transport | node:stop | way:platform |
| public_transport | stop_area | c | st |
And the ways
| nodes | highway | railway | bicycle | public_transport |
| abcd | (nil) | train | yes | |
| st | (nil) | (nil) | | platform |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | d | abcd |
| s | t | st |
| s | d | /st,.+,abcd/ |
And the relations
| type | public_transport | node:stop | way:platform |
| public_transport | stop_area | c | st |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route |
| a | d | abcd |
| s | t | st |
| s | d | /st,.+,abcd/ |
features/bicycle/train.feature
+34 -34
View File
@@ -2,38 +2,38 @@
Feature: Bike - Handle ferry routes
Bringing bikes on trains and subways
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Bringing bikes on trains
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | train | | |
| (nil) | train | no | |
| (nil) | train | yes | x |
| (nil) | railway | | |
| (nil) | railway | no | |
| (nil) | railway | yes | x |
| (nil) | subway | | |
| (nil) | subway | no | |
| (nil) | subway | yes | x |
| (nil) | tram | | |
| (nil) | tram | no | |
| (nil) | tram | yes | x |
| (nil) | light_rail | | |
| (nil) | light_rail | no | |
| (nil) | light_rail | yes | x |
| (nil) | monorail | | |
| (nil) | monorail | no | |
| (nil) | monorail | yes | x |
| (nil) | some_tag | | |
| (nil) | some_tag | no | |
| (nil) | some_tag | yes | x |
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
@construction
Scenario: Bike - Don't route on railways under construction
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | construction | yes | |
Scenario: Bike - Bringing bikes on trains
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | train | | |
| (nil) | train | no | |
| (nil) | train | yes | x |
| (nil) | railway | | |
| (nil) | railway | no | |
| (nil) | railway | yes | x |
| (nil) | subway | | |
| (nil) | subway | no | |
| (nil) | subway | yes | x |
| (nil) | tram | | |
| (nil) | tram | no | |
| (nil) | tram | yes | x |
| (nil) | light_rail | | |
| (nil) | light_rail | no | |
| (nil) | light_rail | yes | x |
| (nil) | monorail | | |
| (nil) | monorail | no | |
| (nil) | monorail | yes | x |
| (nil) | some_tag | | |
| (nil) | some_tag | no | |
| (nil) | some_tag | yes | x |
@construction
Scenario: Bike - Don't route on railways under construction
Then routability should be
| highway | railway | bicycle | bothw |
| primary | | | x |
| (nil) | construction | yes | |
features/bicycle/turn_penalty.feature
+21 -21
View File
@@ -2,32 +2,32 @@
Feature: Turn Penalties
Background:
Given the profile "turnbot"
Given the profile "turnbot"
Scenario: Bike - turns should incur a delay that depend on the angle
Given the node map
| c | d | e |
| b | j | f |
| a | s | g |
| c | d | e |
| b | j | f |
| a | s | g |
And the ways
| nodes |
| sj |
| ja |
| jb |
| jc |
| jd |
| je |
| jf |
| jg |
| nodes |
| sj |
| ja |
| jb |
| jc |
| jd |
| je |
| jf |
| jg |
When I route I should get
| from | to | route | time | distance |
| s | a | sj,ja | 39s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | b | sj,jb | 30s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | c | sj,jc | 29s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | d | sj,jd | 20s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | e | sj,je | 29s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | f | sj,jf | 30s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | g | sj,jg | 39s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| from | to | route | time | distance |
| s | a | sj,ja | 39s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | b | sj,jb | 30s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | c | sj,jc | 29s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | d | sj,jd | 20s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | e | sj,je | 29s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
| s | f | sj,jf | 30s +-1 | 200m +-1 |
| s | g | sj,jg | 39s +-1 | 242m +-1 |
features/bicycle/way.feature
+36 -36
View File
@@ -1,41 +1,41 @@
@routing @bicycle @way
Feature: Bike - Accessability of different way types
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Background:
Given the profile "bicycle"
Scenario: Bike - Routability of way types
Bikes are allowed on footways etc because you can pull your bike at a lower speed.
Pier is not allowed, since it's tagged using man_made=pier.
Then routability should be
| highway | bothw |
| (nil) | |
| motorway | |
| motorway_link | |
| trunk | |
| trunk_link | |
| primary | x |
| primary_link | x |
| secondary | x |
| secondary_link | x |
| tertiary | x |
| tertiary_link | x |
| residential | x |
| service | x |
| unclassified | x |
| living_street | x |
| road | x |
| track | x |
| path | x |
| footway | x |
| pedestrian | x |
| steps | x |
| cycleway | x |
| bridleway | |
| pier | |
Scenario: Bike - Routability of way types
Bikes are allowed on footways etc because you can pull your bike at a lower speed.
Pier is not allowed, since it's tagged using man_made=pier.
Then routability should be
| highway | bothw |
| (nil) | |
| motorway | |
| motorway_link | |
| trunk | |
| trunk_link | |
| primary | x |
| primary_link | x |
| secondary | x |
| secondary_link | x |
| tertiary | x |
| tertiary_link | x |
| residential | x |
| service | x |
| unclassified | x |
| living_street | x |
| road | x |
| track | x |
| path | x |
| footway | x |
| pedestrian | x |
| steps | x |
| cycleway | x |
| bridleway | |
| pier | |
Scenario: Bike - Routability of man_made structures
Then routability should be
| highway | man_made | bothw |
| (nil) | (nil) | |
| (nil) | pier | x |
Scenario: Bike - Routability of man_made structures
Then routability should be
| highway | man_made | bothw |
| (nil) | (nil) | |
| (nil) | pier | x |