ignore invalid only_* restrictions
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b144f22c9
commit
6fac14dbd8
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
|
||||
- Reduced semantic of merge to refer only to merges from a lane onto a motorway-like road
|
||||
- Bugfixes
|
||||
- Fixed an issue that would result in segfaults for viaroutes with an invalid intermediate segment when u-turns were allowed at the via-location
|
||||
- Invalid only_* restrictions could result in loss of connectivity. As a fallback, we assume all turns allowed when the restriction is not valid
|
||||
|
||||
# 5.3.0
|
||||
Changes from 5.3.0-rc.3
|
||||
|
@ -149,11 +149,27 @@ Feature: Car - Turn restrictions
|
||||
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
|
||||
| restriction | sj | wj | j | only_left_turn |
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Only right turn, invalid
|
||||
Given the node map
|
||||
| | n | | |
|
||||
| w | j | e | r |
|
||||
| | s | | |
|
||||
|
||||
And the ways
|
||||
| nodes | oneway |
|
||||
| sj | yes |
|
||||
| nj | -1 |
|
||||
| wj | -1 |
|
||||
| ej | -1 |
|
||||
| re | -1 |
|
||||
|
||||
And the relations
|
||||
| type | way:from | way:to | node:via | restriction |
|
||||
| restriction | sj | er | j | only_right_on |
|
||||
|
||||
When I route I should get
|
||||
| from | to | route |
|
||||
| s | w | sj,wj,wj |
|
||||
| s | n | |
|
||||
| s | e | |
|
||||
| from | to | route |
|
||||
| s | r | sj,ej,re,re |
|
||||
|
||||
@only_turning
|
||||
Scenario: Car - Only right turn
|
||||
|
@ -55,8 +55,21 @@ Intersection IntersectionGenerator::GetConnectedRoads(const NodeID from_node,
|
||||
{
|
||||
Intersection intersection;
|
||||
const NodeID turn_node = node_based_graph.GetTarget(via_eid);
|
||||
const NodeID only_restriction_to_node =
|
||||
restriction_map.CheckForEmanatingIsOnlyTurn(from_node, turn_node);
|
||||
const NodeID only_restriction_to_node = [&]() {
|
||||
// If only restrictions refer to invalid ways somewhere far away, we rather ignore the
|
||||
// restriction than to not route over the intersection at all.
|
||||
const auto only_restriction_to_node =
|
||||
restriction_map.CheckForEmanatingIsOnlyTurn(from_node, turn_node);
|
||||
if (only_restriction_to_node != SPECIAL_NODEID)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// check if we can find an edge in the edge-rage
|
||||
for (const auto onto_edge : node_based_graph.GetAdjacentEdgeRange(turn_node))
|
||||
if (only_restriction_to_node == node_based_graph.GetTarget(onto_edge))
|
||||
return only_restriction_to_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Ignore broken only restrictions.
|
||||
return SPECIAL_NODEID;
|
||||
}();
|
||||
const bool is_barrier_node = barrier_nodes.find(turn_node) != barrier_nodes.end();
|
||||
|
||||
bool has_uturn_edge = false;
|
||||
|
@ -143,11 +143,9 @@ bool RestrictionMap::CheckIfTurnIsRestricted(const NodeID node_u,
|
||||
{
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (node_w != restriction_target.target_node && // target not found
|
||||
restriction_target.is_only) // and is an only restriction
|
||||
{
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We could be tempted to check for `only` restrictions here as well. However, that check is
|
||||
// actually perfomed in intersection generation where we can also verify if the only
|
||||
// restriction is valid at all.
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user