add test for process error codes
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c02542dc5
commit
334f02d7f8
3
Gemfile
3
Gemfile
@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ source "http://rubygems.org"
|
||||
gem "cucumber"
|
||||
gem "rake"
|
||||
gem "osmlib-base"
|
||||
gem "sys-proctable"
|
||||
gem "sys-proctable"
|
||||
gem "rspec-expectations"
|
@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ GEM
|
||||
json (1.6.5)
|
||||
osmlib-base (0.1.4)
|
||||
rake (0.9.2.2)
|
||||
rspec-expectations (2.11.3)
|
||||
diff-lcs (~> 1.1.3)
|
||||
sys-proctable (0.9.1)
|
||||
term-ansicolor (1.0.7)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -24,4 +26,5 @@ DEPENDENCIES
|
||||
cucumber
|
||||
osmlib-base
|
||||
rake
|
||||
rspec-expectations
|
||||
sys-proctable
|
||||
|
@ -3,14 +3,25 @@ Feature: Handle bad data in a graceful manner
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Empty dataset
|
||||
Given the node map
|
||||
| a | b |
|
||||
| |
|
||||
|
||||
Given the ways
|
||||
| nodes |
|
||||
|
||||
When I route I should get
|
||||
| from | to | route |
|
||||
| a | b | |
|
||||
When I preprocess data
|
||||
Then preparing should return code 255
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Only dead-end oneways
|
||||
Given the node map
|
||||
| a | b | c |
|
||||
|
||||
Given the ways
|
||||
| nodes | oneway |
|
||||
| ab | yes |
|
||||
| cb | yes |
|
||||
|
||||
When I preprocess data
|
||||
Then preparing should return code 255
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario: Start/end point at the same location
|
||||
Given the node map
|
||||
@ -29,7 +40,7 @@ Feature: Handle bad data in a graceful manner
|
||||
| 2 | 2 | |
|
||||
|
||||
@poles
|
||||
Scenario: No routing close to the north/south pole
|
||||
Scenario: Routing close to the north/south pole
|
||||
Mercator is undefined close to the poles.
|
||||
All nodes and request with latitude to close to either of the poles should therefore be ignored.
|
||||
|
||||
|
15
features/step_definitions/errors.rb
Normal file
15
features/step_definitions/errors.rb
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
When /^I preprocess data$/ do
|
||||
begin
|
||||
osrm_kill
|
||||
reprocess
|
||||
rescue OSRMError => e
|
||||
@process_error = e
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
Then /^preparing should return code (\d+)$/ do |code|
|
||||
@process_error.class.should == OSRMError
|
||||
@process_error.process.should == 'osrm-prepare'
|
||||
@process_error.code.to_i.should == code.to_i
|
||||
end
|
@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ def reprocess
|
||||
log "== Extracting #{@osm_file}.osm...", :preprocess
|
||||
unless system "../osrm-extract #{@osm_file}.osm.pbf 1>>#{PREPROCESS_LOG_FILE} 2>>#{PREPROCESS_LOG_FILE}"
|
||||
log "*** Exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}.", :preprocess
|
||||
raise "*** osrm-extract exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}. The file preprocess.log might contain more info."
|
||||
raise OSRMError.new 'osrm-extract', $?.exitstatus, "*** osrm-extract exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}. The file preprocess.log might contain more info."
|
||||
end
|
||||
log '', :preprocess
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ def reprocess
|
||||
log "== Preparing #{@osm_file}.osm...", :preprocess
|
||||
unless system "../osrm-prepare #{@osm_file}.osrm #{@osm_file}.osrm.restrictions 1>>#{PREPROCESS_LOG_FILE} 2>>#{PREPROCESS_LOG_FILE}"
|
||||
log "*** Exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}.", :preprocess
|
||||
raise "*** osrm-prepare exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}. The file preprocess.log might contain more info."
|
||||
raise OSRMError.new 'osrm-prepare', $?.exitstatus, "*** osrm-prepare exited with code #{$?.exitstatus}. The file preprocess.log might contain more info."
|
||||
end
|
||||
log '', :preprocess
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -193,4 +193,3 @@ def reprocess
|
||||
write_server_ini
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
1
features/support/env.rb
Normal file
1
features/support/env.rb
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
require 'rspec/expectations'
|
10
features/support/exceptions.rb
Normal file
10
features/support/exceptions.rb
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
class OSRMError < StandardError
|
||||
attr_accessor :process, :code, :msg
|
||||
|
||||
def initialize process, code, msg
|
||||
@process = process
|
||||
@code = code
|
||||
@msg = msg
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user