Open-Harbor/osrm-backend
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity

simply access hierachy test, add tests for implied access

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Emil Tin 2012-10-04 11:30:29 +02:00
parent 8e6b7766a1
commit 216157e00d
2 changed files with 85 additions and 82 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
features/bicycle/access.feature
View File

@ -12,29 +12,27 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
| yes | | | x |
| no | | | |
| | yes | | x |
| yes | yes | | x |
| no | yes | | x |
| | no | | |
| no | yes | | x |
| yes | no | | |
| no | no | | |
| | | yes | x |
| yes | | yes | x |
| no | | yes | x |
| | yes | yes | x |
| yes | yes | yes | x |
| no | yes | yes | x |
| | no | yes | x |
| yes | no | yes | x |
| no | no | yes | x |
| | | no | |
| no | | yes | x |
| yes | | no | |
| no | | no | |
| | no | yes | x |
| | yes | no | |
| yes | yes | no | |
| no | yes | no | |
| | no | no | |
| yes | no | no | |
| no | no | no | |
Scenario: Bike - Overwriting implied acccess
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
| cycleway | | | | x |
| runway | | | | |
| cycleway | no | | | |
| cycleway | | no | | |
| cycleway | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Bike - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be

57
features/car/access.feature
View File

@ -8,36 +8,41 @@ Reference: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Scenario: Car - Access tag hierachy
Then routability should be
| access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| | | | | x |
| yes | | | | x |
| no | | | | |
| yes | yes | | | x |
| | yes | | | x |
| | no | | | |
| no | yes | | | x |
| yes | no | | | |
| no | no | | | |
| yes | yes | yes | | x |
| no | yes | yes | | x |
| yes | no | yes | | x |
| no | no | yes | | x |
| yes | yes | no | | |
| no | yes | no | | |
| yes | no | no | | |
| no | no | no | | |
| yes | yes | yes | yes | x |
| no | yes | yes | yes | x |
| yes | no | yes | yes | x |
| no | no | yes | yes | x |
| yes | yes | no | yes | x |
| no | yes | no | yes | x |
| yes | no | no | yes | x |
| no | no | no | yes | x |
| yes | yes | yes | no | |
| no | yes | yes | no | |
| yes | no | yes | no | |
| no | no | yes | no | |
| yes | yes | no | no | |
| no | yes | no | no | |
| yes | no | no | no | |
| no | no | no | no | |
| | | yes | | x |
| | | no | | |
| no | | yes | | x |
| yes | | no | | |
| | no | yes | | x |
| | yes | no | | |
| | | | yes | x |
| | | | no | |
| no | | | yes | x |
| yes | | | no | |
| | no | | yes | x |
| | yes | | no | |
| | | no | yes | x |
| | | yes | no | |
Scenario: Car - Overwriting implied acccess
Then routability should be
| highway | access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
| primary | | | | | x |
| runway | | | | | |
| primary | no | | | | |
| primary | | no | | | |
| primary | | | no | | |
| primary | | | | no | |
| runway | yes | | | | x |
| runway | | yes | | | x |
| runway | | | yes | | x |
| runway | | | | yes | x |
Scenario: Car - Access tags on ways
Then routability should be